spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 5. The effects of expansion rate on collision-avoidance and landing responses. Each column represents the wing-beat amplitude (WBA), and the landing response probabilities plotted against stimulus position as described in Fig. 4 for a different rate of expansion. The functions shown in Fig. 4 were determined for each fly, with each data point representing the mean ± S.E.M. taken over all the flies. The numbers of flies tested were 8, 11, 11, 8, 12, 11, 8, 10, 7, 7 and 5 for expansion rate in ascending order (starting at 100° s-1). The total numbers of stimulus presentations, again in ascending order, were 1945, 2905, 2584, 1746, 3237, 2529, 216, 2223, 1771, 1391 and 1132. The sinusoidal shape of the wing-stroke amplitude responses holds for all expansion rates, with the amplitude of the response being largest for an expansion rate of 1000° s-1. The probability of landing is high over the greatest range of positions at an expansion rate of 1430° s-1. L, left; R, right; WBF, wing-beat frequency.





Right arrow Return to article