spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)



Fig. 3. Angular distribution of detour vectors in vector ants compared with that of zero-vector ants. Circles represent the first intersections (open circles, vector ants; filled symbols, zero-vector ants) between the trajectories of the ants and concentric circles (radii 1, 2, 3 and 4 m) centred on the ends of the barrier. Vector ants (open arrowheads) and zero-vector ants (filled arrowheads) do not differ in their mean angles and angular variations (P>0.05, Mardia–Watson–Wheeler test) at each of the circles. In both groups of ants, the mean angles do not deviate from the line (0°, arrow) connecting the end of the barrier with the fictive position of the nest relative to the barrier ({square}); angles are given clockwise from this direction. A comparison of the statistical details for vector ants and for zero-vector ants (values given in parentheses) at the 3 m circle for the left side of the barrier shows: mean angles 1.7° (359°); r-values 0.952 (0.941); number of ants 9 (13); 95 % confidence intervals 347.9–15.5° (348.9–13.1°); for the right side of the barrier, mean angles 5.4° (13.2°); r-values 0.969 (0.880); number of ants 10 (10); 95 % confidence intervals 355.1–15.7° (352.5–33.9°).





Right arrow Return to article