spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)



Fig. 6. Scaling of (A) pectoralis muscle power output and (B) net work per wing stroke with body mass Mb. Data are shown for the Phasianidae (open circles), pigeon and Harris’ hawk during take-off (from Table 5), for hummingbirds (Chai and Millard, 1997; Chai et al., 1997), ‘bees’ (euglossine bees, Euglossa imperialis; M. E. Dillon and R. Dudley, in preparation) and worker bumblebees (Cooper, 1993) during loaded hovering or loaded climbing flights. Scaling of (C) pectoralis myofibrillar power output and (D) net myofibrillar work per wing stroke (Wmyo) with body mass. In C and D, data are shown for the Phasianidae, pigeon, small hummingbirds and ‘bees’, calculated by assuming relative myofibrillar volumes of 0.85 (Kaiser and George, 1973; Kiessling, 1977), 0.47 (George and Berger, 1966), 0.50 (Suarez et al., 1991) and 0.55 (Casey and Ellington, 1989), respectively. Relationships that are significantly different from zero are denoted by *(P<0.05) and **(P<0.01).





Right arrow Return to article