spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 17, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1392-1404 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.027045
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, C. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Adaptive echolocation behavior in bats for the analysis of auditory scenes

Chen Chiu*, Wei Xian and Cynthia F. Moss

Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Illustration of assignment of echolocation calls to individual bats. The sound speed is 346.65 m s–1; T1 and T2 is the onset time of recorded calls at microphone 1 and 2, respectively; t1 and t2 is the signal travel time from the bat to microphones 1 and 2, respectively, which are estimated from video recordings; d1 and d2 is the distance between bat and microphone 1 and 2, respectively. Actual audio delay is calculated from audio recordings and is equal to T1T2. Estimated audio delay is calculated from video recordings and is equal to t1t2. Values of real audio delay and estimated audio delay are the same if one call was correctly assigned to the vocalizing bat.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Two examples show the relative position of paired bats and the design of their vocalizations. The 3-D flight paths of each bat in (A) example No. 1 and (B) example No. 2. Arrows in the starting points of each flight curve marked the flight direction of each bat. Flight trajectories of each bat were marked by different colors (blue and red). One bat flew behind the other bat and followed the leading bat's flight trajectory in example No. 1. Two bats flew almost parallel in the beginning of example No. 2. The number beside each flight path is the trial time and matched the x-axis in panel (B) and (D), respectively. Each asterisk and open circle represents one vocalization from bat A (asterisks) and bat B (open circles). The inter-bat distance and call design of bat A and bat B are shown in (B) example No. 1 and (D) example No. 2. The asterisks represent vocalizations from bat A and the open circles represent vocalizations from bat B. From the upper to lower panels are inter-bat distance, start/end frequencies (those two curves with higher values are start frequencies and the other two are end frequencies), duration and sweep rate.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Schematic representation of sequential call analysis. Each point represents the start frequency of one vocalization, and different letters mean calls made by different bats. For example, A1 is the first call bat A produced and B3 is the third call bat B generated. The x-axis is the time and y-axis is the start frequency of calls. Curves between two calls represent two consecutive vocalizations produced by different bats and absolute differences between these two sequential calls are used to represent separation in paired bats' call design. Two consecutive calls, which were not connected by curves, were not included in data analysis because they were produced by the same individual.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Distribution of call design separation between two sequential calls produced by different bats when they flew together. The thick black line in each histogram indicates the baseline separation, which is the difference in call design between two bats when they each flew alone. The percentages mark the proportion of calls that exceed the baseline separation. Call parameters analyzed here are (A) start frequency, (B) end frequency, (C) bandwidth, (D) duration and (E) sweep rate.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. The correlation between each pair's baseline separation and the magnitude of adjustment from baseline to two-bat condition in (A) start frequency, (B) end frequency, (C) bandwidth, (D) duration and (E) sweep rate. *Means P<0.05 and ** means P<0.01. Each data point represents one bat pair and the number next to each point refers to different bat pairs. Only spectral parameters, start/end frequencies and bandwidth, show significant negative correlation.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. The correlation between start/end frequencies separation and proportion of calls with higher start/end frequencies than the preceding call. The closed circles represent start frequency and the open circles represent end frequency in each bat pair. The bat with higher start frequency tended to keep a higher frequency than the other bat in the pair when the start frequency separation is large for this pair. End frequency shows a similar trend to start frequency.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. The mean comparison of each call design separation between two consecutive calls at different inter-bat distance by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Error bars indicate standard error of mean. Different letters mean that there is a significant difference between these two values. The dotted line in each panel shows the baseline separation. Call designs are measured by five parameters: (A) start frequency, (B) end frequency, (C) bandwidth, (D) duration and (E) sweep rate.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. The amount of deviation from baseline data in the two-bat condition for each bat in each pair. White and gray bars indicate data from different bats in a pair. Five call parameters were presented here: (A) start frequency, (B) end frequency, (C) bandwidth, (D) duration and (E) sweep rate. All deviated amounts are either significantly larger or smaller than zero, except those marked with n.s. The x-axis shows bat pairs and these bat pair numbers correspond to those shown in Fig. 5. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. The magnitude of call design adjustment from baseline to two-bat condition as a function of pulse intervals. Error bats indicate standard error of mean and different letters mean that there is a significant difference between these two values. The x-axis is the pulse interval of individual bats and the y-axis is the magnitude of adjustment for five call parameters: (A) start frequency, (B) end frequency, (C) bandwidth, (D) duration and (E) sweep rate.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009