spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 17, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1344-1350 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.021881
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niggebrügge, C.
Right arrow Articles by de Ibarra, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Niggebrügge, C.
Right arrow Articles by de Ibarra, N. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fast learning but coarse discrimination of colours in restrained honeybees

C. Niggebrügge1, G. Leboulle1, R. Menzel1, B. Komischke1 and N. Hempel de Ibarra1,2,*

1 Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Free University of Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
2 Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Colour discrimination and generalisation after absolute conditioning. Bees were exposed to either a blue or yellow spot and rewarded with sucrose solution during 10 training trials. The graph depicts the rate of proboscis extensions to the trained stimulus before delivering the reward. Following acquisition, each bee trained with the blue stimulus (triangles) was tested subsequently with a yellow, dim blue (d. blue), green and white unrewarded stimulus (black bars). Similarly, bees trained to a yellow stimulus (diamonds) were tested with a blue, dim yellow (d. yellow), green and white test stimulus (chequered bars). Bars for test responses are arranged according to the chromatic distance between the test stimulus and the respective rewarded colour stimulus (CS+) (descending order). Asterisks depict significant differences between responses during the last acquisition trial and the test trial (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P<0.05). Differences in responses to test stimuli were assessed for the groups trained to blue (black bars) and yellow (checkered bars) separately (McNemar {chi}2 test; bars with different letters differ significantly from each other, P<0.05). PER, proboscis extension response.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Colour discrimination and generalisation after differential conditioning. (A) Some bees were trained to the yellow stimulus as rewarded colour stimulus (CS+) (closed diamonds) versus the blue stimulus as unrewarded colour stimulus (CS–) (closed triangles) and tested with dim yellow (d. yellow) and green stimuli (black bars). Other bees were also trained to the yellow stimulus as CS+ (open diamonds) but experienced a green CS– (open circles). They were tested with blue, dim yellow and dim green (d. green) test stimuli (white bars). (B) In the reversal group, bees were exposed to a yellow CS– versus a blue CS+ (closed diamonds and triangles, respectively) or a green CS+ (open circles) (corresponding yellow CS–: open diamonds). The former bees were tested with a green and dim blue (d. blue) stimulus (black bars). Bees rewarded on the green stimulus were tested with a dim green, dim yellow and blue stimulus (open bars). Asterisks depict significant differences between responses during the last acquisition trial and the test trial (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P<0.05). PER, proboscis extension response.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Differential conditioning of different intensities. Bees were trained to discriminate a dim yellow (d. yellow) rewarded colour stimulus (CS+) (closed diamonds) from a yellow unrewarded colour stimulus (CS–) (closed squares; N=14) or vice-versa (open symbols; N=16). Response rates are depicted separately for CS+ (solid lines) and CS– (broken lines). After training, they were tested with a similar and dissimilar colour, green and blue, respectively (black bars, bees trained to dim yellow CS+; white bars, bees trained to yellow CS+). Asterisks depict significant differences between responses during the last acquisition trial and the test trial (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P<0.05). PER, proboscis extension response.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Differential conditioning of intermediate colours. Bees were trained to discriminate a blue rewarded colour stimulus (CS+) (closed triangles) against a white unrewarded colour stimulus (CS–) (closed squares) or a yellow CS– (open diamonds) (corresponding blue CS+: open triangles), respectively. The first group was tested with a yellow and dim blue (d. blue) test stimulus (black bars), while the other group that experienced the yellow CS– was tested with a white and dim blue test stimulus (open bars). Asterisks depict significant differences between responses during the last acquisition trial and the test trial (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P<0.05). PER, proboscis extension response.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Memory test and extinction trials after absolute conditioning. The memory recall for a previously rewarded yellow stimulus was tested after one hour of rest following a three trial conditioning period (grey circles). To test the response to extinction trials, bees were trained during three (black triangles) or seven learning trials (black squares) with a yellow stimulus. The training was followed by nine or five subsequent unrewarded stimulus presentations (open symbols), respectively. The asterisk depicts significant differences between responses during the last acquisition trial and unrewarded trials (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P<0.05).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009