spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 13, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 704-712 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.015875
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Urea transporter and glutamine synthetase regulation and localization in gulf toadfish gill

M. Danielle McDonald1,*, Branka Vulesevic2, Steve F. Perry2 and Patrick J. Walsh2

1 Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149 USA
2 Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. (A) Plasma cortisol concentrations and (B) plasma urea concentrations in toadfish that were relatively unstressed (uncrowded) compared with those under different experimental treatments. Values are means + 1 s.e.m. Different letters depicted significant difference, P<0.05.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. (A) Total glutamine synthetase (GS) activity, (B) relative mRNA expression of the gill-specific GS isoform (GGS) and (C) relative mRNA expression of the ubiquitous isoform (LGS). Notably, treatments that resulted in changes in enzyme activity do not correspond to mRNA expression changes in either GS isoform. Values are means + 1 s.e.m. Different letters depict significant difference, P<0.05.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Relative tUT mRNA expression in gill of toadfish that are unstressed (uncrowded) compared to those under different experimental treatments. In addition to elevations in tUT mRNA expression observed in cortisol-infused fish, the greatest elevation in expression was measured in fish that were infused with urea. Values are means + 1 s.e.m. Different letters depicted significant difference, P<0.05.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. (A) Daily excretion of urea in toadfish that were saline infused for an initial 48 h control period and were then switched to being infused either with saline or with cortisol for a subsequent 48 h. A significant decrease in excretion was measured in cortisol-treated fish compared with their urea excretion values measured during the control period and compared with saline-infused fish at the same time point. (B) Daily excretion of urea in toadfish that were saline infused for an initial 48 h control period and were then switched to being infused with either urea alone or urea+RU486. Both groups showed a significant elevation in urea excretion compared with the initial saline control period; however, the treatments were not significantly different from one another. Values are means ± 1 s.e.m.; *P<0.05, significantly different from corresponding treatment group; {dagger}P<0.05, significantly different from control infusion period.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. The pattern of Na+/K+-ATPase (A,B), GGS (C) and tUT (D) localization in the toadfish gill whether by in situ hybridization (A,C,D) or immunocytochemistry (B), demonstrating Na+/K+-ATPase-positive mitochondria-rich cells (MRCs) scattered along the lamellae (A,B). The insets in A and B represent a no-probe negative control and a negative control in which primary antibody was omitted, respectively. GGS (C) and tUT mRNA (D) showed a similar pattern of staining to Na+/K+-ATPase, scattered along the lamellae and within the interlamellar regions. The scale bars indicate 50 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009