spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 30, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 499-505 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.022988
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dussutour, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fourcassié, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dussutour, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fourcassié, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Priority rules govern the organization of traffic on foraging trails under crowding conditions in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica

A. Dussutour1,2,3,*,{dagger}, S. Beshers2, J. L. Deneubourg3 and V. Fourcassié1

1 Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition animale, UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
2 Unit of Social Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
3 Department of Entomology, 320 Morrill Hall, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Head-on collisions between (A) outbound and inbound unladen ants and (B) outbound and inbound laden ants. After a collision, either the inbound or the outbound ant moves to the bridge side to allow the passage of the oncoming ants. The follower ants might benefit from the passage of the leading ant (the ant that was given way) before the ant that gave way returns to the top of the bridge.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Distribution frequency of the size of the groups of successive ants traveling in the same direction for the two types of bridges used in the experiment. The distributions for the two directions have been pooled on the graph. The distribution frequency of the group size obtained with a random sequence of ants generated on the basis of an equal probability of occurrence of nestbound and outbound ants is also represented. N=5 replicates for each bridge. The inset shows the distribution frequency as a function of group size in natural log scale.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Proportion of laden ants for each size of the groups of inbound ants. The number of laden and unladen ants are indicated in bold and regular font style, respectively. The results of five replicates have been pooled. The dashed line shows the expected proportion of laden ants for each group size, i.e. the mean proportion of laden ants in the inbound flow of the five replicates (0.24). We used a {chi}2 goodness-of-fit test to test whether the proportion of laden ants for each group size differed from the expected value. A significant result means either that laden ants are underrepresented (for group size <5) or overrepresented (for group size >5) in the groups. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Proportion of laden ants occupying each position within a group (>1 individual) of inbound ants – that is, the number of laden ants in the ith position divided by the total number of ants in the ith position. The numbers of laden and unladen ants for each position are indicated in bold and regular font style, respectively. The results of five replicates have been pooled. We used a {chi}2 goodness-of-fit test to test whether the proportion of laden ants occupying each position differed from the expected value – that is, the proportion of laden ants in groups whose size is ≥(i+1). Laden ants were significantly overrepresented in the first and second position and were significantly underrepresented in position >6th. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Expected and observed proportions of inbound groups led by a laden ant as a function of group size. The expected proportion corresponds to the proportion of laden ants observed for each group size (see Fig. 3). If the laden ants were equally distributed within the group, we would expect a 0.24 chance to observe them in the first position. We used a {chi}2 goodness-of-fit test to test whether the proportion of laden ants for each group size differed from the expected value. The significant result for group size >3 means that laden ants are significantly more likely to occupy the first position than any other position within the groups. The results of five replicates have been pooled. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Probability of a follower ant of benefiting from the passage of the leading ant according to its position in a group of inbound or outbound ants. The leading ants are the ants that are given way to after a head-on encounter (N=99, N=301 and N=294 for inbound unladen ants, outbound ants and laden ants, respectively). The ant occupying the first position is the one immediately behind the leading ant. The probability for each ith position is computed by dividing the number of ants in the ith position that benefited from the passage of the leading ant by the total number of groups whose size is ≥(i+1). For example, an ant immediately behind (1st position) a laden ant has a 0.99 probability of benefiting from the passage of the leading ant. The probability value becomes 0.59 if the leading ant is unladen. The inset shows the distribution of the number of ants that benefited from the passage of a leading ant. The dotted line within the boxplots represents the median, and the lower and upper boundaries of the boxes represent, respectively, the 25th and 75th percentiles, while the whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values within 1.5 box lengths. The asterisks represent the outliers. The bars bearing different letters are significantly different at the 1% level of significance (one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post-hoc test).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009