spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 16, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 363-372 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.023739
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Too much of a good thing: how insects cope with excess ions or toxins in the diet

M. J. O'Donnell

Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams showing (A) the excretory system in Rhodnius prolixus and current models of (B) Na+, K+, Cl and H2O secretion across the upper Malpighian tubule (UMT) and (C) K+ and Cl reabsorption across the lower Malpighian tubule (LMT). Pi, inorganic phosphate.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Rates of urate and para-aminohippurate (PAH) transport by isolated Malpighian tubules of fifth instar Rhodnius prolixus at the times indicated after the blood meal on day 0 (A) or day 20 (B). Data replotted from Maddrell and Gardiner and from O'Donnell et al. (Maddrell and Gardiner, 1975Go; O'Donnell et al., 1983Go).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Non-invasive measurement of ion fluxes by the scanning ion-selective electrode technique (SIET). (A) The technique exploits gradients in ion activity within the unstirred layer that are created by ion transport across cells or epithelia. In this example, secretion of tetraethylammonium (TEA) across the epithelium in the direction of the arrows reduces the concentration of TEA close to the epithelial surface relative to that farther away. The size of the labels and the density of the shading correspond to the concentration of TEA. (B) Schematic diagram of equipment used for SIET measurements. The isolated tissue and the ion-selective microelectrode (ISME) are observed through a microscope equipped with a CCD camera. A computer-controlled motion control system drives an orthogonal (X, Y, Z) array of stepper motors which move the amplifier headstage and attached ISME to sites along the tissue and then at two points orthogonal to the tissue surface, as indicated in A. Voltage differences between the two limits of excursion are recorded by the data acquisition system. Voltage gradients at different sites can be overlaid as vectors on an image of the tissue captured by the frame grabber connected to the CCD camera (as shown in Fig. 5A).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Measurement of the concentration of TEA in droplets of fluid secreted by isolated Malpighian tubules in the Ramsay assay. (A) An isolated pair of Drosophila Malpighian tubules is placed in a droplet of bathing saline under paraffin oil. One tubule remains in the saline, and the other is pulled out and wrapped around a stainless steel pin embedded in the Sylgard-line base of a Petri dish. Secreted fluid droplets which form at the ureter, positioned just outside the bathing saline droplet, are collected on glass rods and placed on the bottom of the dish adjacent to calibration droplets containing known concentrations of TEA in Drosophila saline. For each droplet, the potential difference between the TEA-selective microelectrode (TEA ME) and the reference microelectrode (Ref ME) is measured by a high impedance (>1015 {Omega}) operational amplifier and recorded on a PC-based data acquisition system. TEA concentration in the secreted droplets is calculated from the voltage difference between the secreted droplet and the calibration droplets, as described by Rheault and O'Donnell (Rheault and O'Donnell, 2004Go). The tip of the TEA-ME is coated with a solution of ~10% polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in tetrahydrofuran to avoid capillary rise of the paraffin oil into the silanized microelectrode. (B) Photograph showing 20 Drosophila tubules set up in a Ramsay assay in a 55 mm diameter Petri dish. One of the 20 µl bathing droplets is indicated by the white arrow. Each tubule is secured to a black minutien pin anchored in the Sylgard to the right of each bathing saline droplet. Three secreted droplets collected at 30 min intervals are shown within the red ellipse. Reference and TEA-selective microelectrodes (green arrows) are positioned in a bathing saline droplet.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. (A) Representative scan of TEA flux at locations along the secretory main segment of the Malpighian tubule (MT) and the LMT. Tubules were bathed in saline containing 100 µmol l–1 TEA. Part of the other LMT of the pair of tubules and the common ureter are shown. The tip of the TEA-selective microelectrode is located just above the asterisk. At each site, indicated by arrows, the software calculated the TEA-specific signal differences ({Delta}V; µV) between the two limits of microelectrode excursion by subtracting the voltage at the outer limit of the excursion from that measured at the inner limit. The length of each arrow corresponds to the magnitude of TEA influx. (B) TEA influx is plotted as a function of distance from the ureter along lower, main and distal segments of the MT. Each point is the mean ± s.e.m. of four tubules. Influx of TEA reduces TEA concentration in the unstirred layer adjacent to the surface of the tissue, and the corresponding voltage difference is therefore negative. Distance 0 on the abscissa corresponds to the junction of the ureter and the LMT. Both the differential signal recorded by the TEA-selective microelectrode (right ordinate) and the calculated TEA influx (left ordinate) are shown. Figure is replotted from Rheault and O'Donnell (Rheault and O'Donnell, 2004Go).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Plots of TEA influx as a function of bathing saline TEA concentration for (A) the LMT, (B) the main segment and (C) the posterior midgut. Each point is the mean ± s.e.m. of N=4–7 preparations. Values for Jmax and Kt were determined by non-linear regression analysis as described in Rheault and O'Donnell (Rheault and O'Donnell, 2004Go), from which this figure is taken.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Effects of chronic exposure of Drosophila larvae to dietary salicylate on (A) fluid secretion rate, (B) salicylate concentration in the secreted fluid and (C) transepithelial flux of salicylate across the main segment of isolated Malpighian tubules set up in the Ramsay assay. Each point represents the mean ± s.e.m. of 7–10 tubules. Solid and broken lines indicate the control and experimental group, respectively. Experimental larvae were raised for 10 days on a 10 mmol l–1 salicylate-enriched diet. Control larvae were raised on a salicylate-free diet. Figure replotted from Ruiz-Sanchez and O'Donnell (Ruiz-Sanchez and O'Donnell, 2007bGo).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009