spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 26, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 313-324 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.022459
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnovicz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hermitte, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burnovicz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hermitte, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The cardiac response of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus as an index of sensory perception

Ana Burnovicz, Damian Oliva and Gabriela Hermitte*

Laboratorio de Neurobiología de la Memoria, Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, IFIBYNE-CONICET, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. A drawing of the placement of the recording leads for monitoring the heart of Chasmagnathus. On the dorsal carapace, two leads spanned the rostral-caudal axis of the heart to monitor heart rate. The free ends of both wires were soldered to the pins of a jack cemented to the dorsal carapace in a more anterior position.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. (Ai) Representation of the set up used for recording the heart rate and locomotor activity during the presentation of the different stimuli. The crab is lodged in the actometer (a bowl-shaped opaque container, c) and connected to the impedance detector (UFI, model 2991) by means of a jack (J). The impedance output is sent to a computer to allow HR to be monitored. The crab's escape response is recorded by means of four microphones (M) cemented to the bottom of the container. This set up was used for the presentation of three different stimuli: a light pulse generated by a white light-emitting-diode (LED) placed 7 cm above the animal, an air puff presented in direction to the animal's cephalotorax carapace 1 cm from above, and an opaque rectangular screen (the VDS) placed 6 cm above the crab. (Aii) The VDS is a motor-operated screen (an opaque rectangular strip of 25.0 cmx7.5 cm) moved horizontally over the animal from left to right and vice versa. (B) Representation of the set up used for the recording of the HR and locomotor activity during the presentation of different virtual looming stimuli. A single PC using commercial software is used to generate visual expansion stimuli projecting on a flat screen monitor located at 20 cm in front of the animal that is lodged in a transparent box and connected to the impedance detector (UFI, model 2991) by means of a jack. The impedance output is sent to a computer to allow HR to be monitored. The crab's escape response is recorded by means of four microphones cemented to the bottom of the box. (C) The looming stimulus consisted in a simulated projection of an approaching object from the monitor screen. The simulation corresponded to a black square object of 5 cm that approached from a distance of 70 cm at different constant velocities (see methods). (D) Representative recording of cardiac activity. The duration of the cardiac event or period (p) is measured and used to calculate the instant heart rate (IHR) as the inverse of the period (IHR=1/p). The dashed line stands for a stimulus. IHRM, IHR, R1 and R2 are also defined in the text.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Representative recording of heart rate prior to and during the presentation of stimuli regarded as innocuous: (A) light pulse, (B) air puff; and threatening: (C) visual danger stimulus (VDS), (D) looming stimuli. Upper trace: first presentation; lower trace: second presentation. The solid lines indicate the stimulus presentation.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Representative heart rate (upper trace) and locomotor activity (lower trace) recordings of two different animals (crab 1 and crab 2) without and during sensory stimulation. (Ai) no stimulation present, (Aii) during the presentation of an air puff to the same animal; (Bi) no stimulation present, (Bii) during the presentation of a VDS to the same animal. The solid lines indicate the stimulus presentation.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Representative recordings of the normalized IHR of three crabs prior to and during the presentation of a 5 s air puff. The black line is the mean of the total number of animals. The bar graph in each panel shows, for all animals, the mean IHR of one event prior to and during stimulation (R1 and R2, respectively) revealing significant differences between them (P<0.01). (A) Unrestrained condition. (B) Restrained condition. The solid line indicates the stimulus presentation.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Representative recordings of the normalized IHR of three crabs prior to and during the presentation of a light pulse. The black line is the mean of the total number of animals. The bar graph in each panel shows, for all animals, the mean instant heart rate (IHR) of one event prior to and after stimulation (R1 and R2, respectively) revealing significant differences between them (P<0.01). (A) Unrestrained condition. (B) Restrained condition. The solid lines indicates the stimulus presentation.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Representative recordings of the normalized instant heart rate (IHR) of three crabs prior to and during the presentation of the looming stimulus of 20 cm s–1. The black line is the mean of the total number of animals. The bar graph in each panel shows, for all animals, the mean IHR of one event prior and after stimulation (R1 and R2, respectively) revealing significant differences between them (P<0.01). (A) In the unrestrained condition the looming stimuli were initiated after a 0.9 s delay relative to the heart rate recording (vertical dashed line). The mean escape response of freely moving animals is shown in the black lower trace. (B) In the restrained condition looming stimuli were initiated simultaneously with the heart rate recording. The dotted line represents the expansion of the virtual approaching stimulus plotted against time.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Representative recordings of the normalized HR of three crabs prior to and during the presentation of the looming stimulus of 5 cm s–1. The black line is the mean of the total number of animals. The bar graph in each panel shows, for all animals, the mean IHR of one event prior and after stimulation (R1 and R2, respectively) revealing significant differences between them (P<0.01). (A) In the unrestrained condition the looming stimuli were initiated after a 0.9 s delay relative to the heart rate recording (vertical dashed line). The mean escape response of freely moving animals is shown in the black lower trace. (B) In the restrained condition looming stimuli were initiated simultaneously with the heart rate recording. The dotted line represents the expansion of the virtual approaching stimulus plotted against time.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Representative recordings of the normalized IHR of three restrained crabs prior and during the presentation of the visual danger stimulus (VDS). The thick line is the mean of the total number of animals. The bar graph in each panel shows, for all animals, the mean IHR of one event prior and after stimulation (R1 and R2, respectively) revealing significant differences between (P<0.01). The solid line indicates the stimulus presentation.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. (A) Probability of response to three stimuli (looming stimulus, air puff, light pulse). (i) Restrained condition. (ii) Unrestrained condition. (B) Cardiac response latency to the presentation of different looming expansions. (i) Restrained condition. (ii) Unrestrained condition.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 11. (A) Comparison between the escape response and the cardiac response latencies to the presentation of different looming stimuli (40 cm s–1; 20 cm s–1; 10 cm s–1; 5 cm s–1). (B) Linear correlation between cardiac and escape responses.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009