First published online May 15, 2009
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 1716-1730 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.024851
Ammonia and urea transporters in gills of fish and aquatic crustaceans
Dirk Weihrauch1,
Michael P. Wilkie2 and
Patrick J. Walsh3,*
1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 190 Dysart Road,
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2 Canada
2 Department of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Avenue West,
Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5 Canada
3 Department of Biology, Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics,
University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5 Canada

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. An updated model of ammonia excretion by typical freshwater fishes. As
CO2 is excreted across the gills it is hydrated in the gill water
(unstirred boundary layers) to generate H+ and
HCO3–. The resulting H+ generated by
CO2 hydration, and probably apical H+-ATPase activity,
traps NH3 as NH4+, as it passively diffuses
into the gill water, maintaining the transcellular
PNH3 gradient. Emerging genomic and
physiological evidence suggests that ammonia transport across the plasma
membrane of gill cells depends upon the presence of Rhesus glycoproteins (see
text for references). Based on this evidence it is speculated that Rhcg or
Rhbg glycoproteins on the basolateral membrane act as the conduit for
NH3 transport (but see discussion about whether Rh glycoproteins
are also NH4+ permeable) into the gill cell cytosol,
followed by outward NH3 diffusion via apical Rhcg
glycoproteins. The possibility also remains that a unique
Na+-dependent NH4+-ATPase, as yet
uncharacterized, also contributes to basolateral ammonia transport
(Salama et al., 1999 ). Owing
to the presence of deep tight junctions between adjacent cells in the
freshwater gill, it seems unlikely that there is appreciable paracellular
NH4+ diffusion in freshwater fishes. CA, carbonic
anhydrase. See text for further details. (Modified from
Wilkie, 2002 .)
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Updated model of ammonia excretion by marine fishes. Ammonia excretion in
sea water probably occurs by both passive NH3 and
NH4+ diffusion via transcellular pathways, and
`leakier' paracellular routes. Owing to the higher buffering capacity of sea
water, gill water acidification is probably not involved in the ammonia
excretion process. As the predominant cells found in the gill epithelium,
pavement cells (PV cells) are probably the major site of ammonia excretion in
marine fishes. Convincing evidence from pufferfish suggests that Rhbg and
Rhcg2 glycoproteins are restricted to the basolateral and apical membranes of
PV cells, respectively (Nakada et al.,
2007b ). Such an arrangement supports a model in which
NH3 enters the cytosol via a basolateral Rhbg, and exits
via the apical Rhcg2. The convincing evidence that NHE2 is expressed
in the gills of many marine fishes supports the hypothesis that apical
Na+/NH4+ exchange also contributes to
branchial ammonia excretion. However, as NHE2 proteins are mainly restricted
to mitochondria rich (MR) cells, which cover a small proportion of the gill
epithelium, their contribution to total ammonia excretion may be minor.
Ammonia may incidentally enter the MR cells by displacing K+ on the
branchial Na+/2Cl–/K+ co-transporter
and/or the Na+/K+-ATPase. Apical Rhcg1 and/or apical
Na+/NH4+ exchange may therefore serve as
`relief valves' that promote the removal of ammonia that enters the MR cell
via these basolateral transport systems. See text for further
details. (Modified from Wilkie,
2002 .)
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. (A) Ammonia excretion across the gills of the giant mudskipper P.
schlosseri. NH4+ has a similar hydrated radius to
K+. Extracellular NH4+ may therefore enter
the cytosol of MR cells, which are abundant on the lamellae of the gill,
via either ouabain-sensitive Na+/K+-ATPases
and/or Na+/2Cl–/K+ co-transporters
which are expressed in the MR cells at high levels. Ammonia may also enter the
cytosol by passive NH3 diffusion, and subsequently be excreted to
the water when favorable PNH3 gradients are present. It is
not known if Rh glycoproteins play any role in NH3 diffusion in the
mudskipper. Under conditions of high environmental ammonia, or when ammonia
accumulates in water chambers formed by fused lamellae,
NH4+ appears to be extruded via an
amiloride-sensitive Na+/NH4+ (H+)
antiporter on the MR cell apical membrane. Base excretion probably takes place
via the apical Cl–/HCO3–
exchange, with Cl– returning to the water via an
apical cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel (not
shown) (modified from Wilson et al.,
2000 ). See text for further details. (B) Possible mode of ammonia
volatilization by the Mangrove killifish (K. marmoratus).
Alkalinization of the cutaneous surface moves the pH of this region nearer the
pK' of ammonia, generating high NH3 partial
pressures. The NH3 is subsequently volatilized as air currents move
across the skin surface. Based on molecular evidence, it seems logical to
suggest that at least some NH3 enters the cytosolic compartment
via Rhbg, but during air exposure basolateral
NH4+ transport would also probably be needed to generate
the high cytosolic total ammonia and PNH3 needed to
facilitate the transfer of the NH3 to the surface of the skin. Both
Rhcg1 and/or Rhcg2 mRNA expression increases during air exposure in K.
marmoratus, suggesting that outward transfer of NH3 across the
apical membrane of cutaneous cells is via these glycoproteins. The
mechanism of cutaneous surface alkalinization in air-exposed K.
marmoratus has not yet been resolved. Alkalinization could involve apical
Cl–/HCO3– exchange, which would
depend upon carbonic anhydrase-mediated CO2 hydration in the gill
cytosol leading to the generation of the required
HCO3–. However, the simultaneously generated
H+ would tend to acidify the intracellular space, unless it was
removed via a basolateral transport system (not shown), as has been
suggested in fish gut epithelia (Grosell,
2006 ). The model depicted is based on original studies by Frick
and Wright (Frick and Wright,
2002a , Frick and Wright,
2002b ), Littwiller et al. (Littwiller et al., 2006) and Hung et
al. (Hung et al., 2007 ). See
text for further details.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Proposed hypothetical model of active ammonia excretion across gills of the
shore crab Carcinus maenas. According to this model,
NH4+ is pumped across the basolateral membrane by
Na+/K+-ATPase or traverses the membrane via
Cs+-sensitive channels. Dissociation of cytosolic
NH4+ to H+ and NH3 is accompanied
by diffusion of NH3 into vesicles acidified by a
H+-ATPase. The ammonia-loaded vesicles then are moved via
microtubules to the apical membrane where vesicles fuse with the external
membrane, releasing NH4+ into the subcuticular space.
Then the NH4+ is believed to diffuse across the cuticle,
via amiloride-sensitive structures. The role and location of the crustacean
ammonia transporter RhCM, identified in Carcinus maenas gill epithelium
(GenBank accession: AF364404), are presently uncharacterized. Paracellular
ammonia diffusion and non-ionic transcellular diffusion of NH3
might also occur under physiologically meaningful transepithelial ammonia
gradients (modified from Weihrauch et
al., 2004 ).
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009