spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 16, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 126-136 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
doi: 10.1242/jeb.020412
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rotte, C.
Right arrow Articles by Walz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rotte, C.
Right arrow Articles by Walz, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Source, topography and excitatory effects of GABAergic innervation in cockroach salivary glands

Cathleen Rotte, Jeannine Witte, Wolfgang Blenau, Otto Baumann and Bernd Walz*

Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Department of Animal Physiology, University of Potsdam Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Anti-GABA labeling of a subesophageal ganglion (SOG, whole-mount) that was backfilled via the salivary duct nerve (SDN) with TMR-dextran. (A) A SOG (outline indicated by gray broken lines). The nerve (indicated by gray dotted lines) is partially out of view because it leaves the plane of the optical section and was turned over the ganglion during the embedding procedure. Upon entering the ganglion, the pathways (indicated by white dotted lines) of the two thick axons diverge. One axon extends to a soma with contralateral, anterioventral position (SN1) and the other originates at a soma with ipsilateral, midventral position (SN2). (B–D) Anti-GABA labeling (green) of a SOG that was backfilled with TMR-dextran (red). The right panel shows the composite images. SN1 is labeled only with TMR-dextran (B) whereas SN2 is labeled with both TMR-dextran and anti-GABA (C). Other GABA-positive neurons contain no TMR-dextran (D). Bar A, 250 µm, bar for B,C in D, 50 µm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Distribution of GABA-positive fibers on the various components of the salivary gland complex. Whole-mount preparations of salivary glands were stained with anti-GABA (green) and AlexaFluor488-phalloidin (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) A simplified schematic illustration of the organization of the salivary gland complex. The paired salivary glands consist of lobules of acinar tissue. The salivary ducts unite to an efferent salivary duct (1) from each gland, and the two efferent salivary ducts unite to a single main salivary duct (2). The paired reservoirs open into reservoir ducts (3) that unite to the main reservoir duct (4). Red rectangles in A outline the areas shown in B–E. (B) The salivary duct nerve (SDN) contains two thick axons, one of them labeled by anti-GABA. (C) Anti-GABA-immunoreactive fibers (arrowheads) in the reservoir muscle. (D) A nerve that interlinks an acinar lobule (lower right) with the reservoir (asterisks). Anti-GABA-positive fibers (arrowheads) branch and have numerous varicosities within the nerve. (E) An acinar lobule and the associated salivary duct (arrow). P-cells are arranged in pairs with their microvilli intensely stained with phalloidin (blue), providing the appearance of `bow ties'. A loose network of anti-GABA-reactive fibers is associated with the acinar tissue but not the salivary duct (arrow). (F–H,J–L) Two series of confocal sections through acinar lobules. Each image shows the sum of 17 consecutive optical sections, representing a total thickness of 6.2 µm. The labelling in the upper right indicates the plane of the optical section. (I,M) The sum of all images. P-cells are indicated by asterisks. C-cells in the interior of the acinar lobules are identified by short phalloidin-stained microvilli (open arrowheads). In the lobule shown in (F–I), GABA-positive fibers remain and terminate (arrowhead in G) on the surface of the lobule. In (J–M), GABA-positive fibers extend deep into the acinar lobules (arrows). All bars, 50 µm; bar in M is for F–M.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Distribution of putative release sites for GABA on the salivary gland complex. Whole-mount preparations of salivary glands were stained with anti-GABA (green), anti-synapsin (red) and AlexaFluor488-phalloidin (blue), and imaged by confocal microscopy. Broken-lined rectangles outline the areas that are shown at higher magnification in the insets on the upper right of each image. Putative release sites for GABA are labeled by anti-GABA and anti-synapsin and are indicated by yellow staining in the composite images on the right. Red foci on the composite images may represent release sites for other neurotransmitters. (A–C) Putative release sites for GABA on an acinar lobule. Some putative GABA release sites (open arrowheads) are juxtaposed, others (arrowheads) reside at distance to release sites for other neurotransmitters. (D–F) Putative release sites for GABA in a nerve that interlinks acinar lobules. Most putative release sites for GABA (arrowheads) keep some distance to release sites for other neurotransmitters. Bars A–F, 25 µm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Changes in the membrane potential (Vm) recorded from acinar cells during bath application of GABA, dopamine and 5-HT. (A) Superfusion of isolated salivary glands with PS containing 1 mmol l–1 GABA does not affect the resting Vm of acinar cells. Control application of 100 nmol l–1 dopamine evokes multiphasic changes in the Vm of the acinar cell, showing that the isolated gland is functionally intact. (B,D) Co-application of GABA and either dopamine or serotonin (5-HT). 1 mmol l–1 GABA has no measurable effect on the amplitudes and kinetics of dopamine- or 5-HT-induced Vm changes in acinar cells. (C) Quantitative summary (means ± s.e.m.) of the experiments illustrated in B and D. Response amplitudes induced by co-application of dopamine or 5-HT and GABA, normalized to control amplitudes with 5-HT or dopamine, respectively, prior to co-application. The amplitude was taken as the range from the hyperpolarization peak to the depolarization peak. 1 mmol l–1 GABA did not significantly alter the dopamine-(N=5) and 5-HT-induced (N=6) changes in Vm. Duration of dopamine, 5-HT and GABA applications are indicated by bars.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Membrane potential (Vm) changes in acinar cells induced by electrical salivary duct nerve (SDN)-stimulation (A,C). Asterisks mark the timepoints of electrical stimulation (5 V, 0.2 ms, 5 Hz, 2 s trains). The black arrow in A indicates the hyperpolarization, the open arrow the depolarization induced by one train of electrical stimuli. The box in C indicates the response shown in A. (B) Dose-response relations determined from the changes in Vm induced by bath application of increasing dopamine (black line, means ± s.e.m., N=7) and serotonin (broken line, means ± s.e.m., N=7) concentrations. The mean change in Vm recorded from acinar cells upon electrical SDN-stimulation (13 mV; black line, N=21) is within the dynamic range of the dose-response relations for both neurotransmitters. (D) Bath application of GABA (5 µmol l–1) during SDN-stimulation leads to enhanced amplitudes of the electrical responses recorded from acinar cells. The response amplitudes recover after GABA washout. (E) Comparison of the amplitudes of changes in Vm induced by SDN-stimulation in the absence (control) and in the presence of GABA (N=21, means ± s.e.m.). The mean amplitude of at least two or more consecutive control stimulations was compared by a paired t-test to the mean amplitude of at least two or more stimulations during bath application of GABA. ***P<0.0001.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Effects of agonists and antagonists for various GABA receptor subtypes on the membrane potential (Vm) changes evoked by salivary duct nerve (SDN)-stimulation. Asterisks mark the timepoints of stimulation (5 V, 0.2 ms, 5 Hz, 2 s trains). The duration of drug application is indicated by bars. (A,B) Application of SKF97541 or baclofen mimic the GABA-induced enhancement in the electrical responses. (C,D) CGP52432 and CGP54626 suppress the GABA-induced enhancement. (E) The GABABR antagonist CGP52432 suppresses the SKF97541-induced enhancement. (F) Bicuculline-induced augmentation of electrical responses of acinar cells to SDN-stimulation. (G) Bar chart for the effects of all tested drugs. The gray dotted line indicates the control amplitude (=100%) induced by electrical SDN-stimulation in the absence of GABA and other drugs. The number of replicates for each bar is stated in parentheses. The bars show means±s.e.m. Muscimol (GABAAR agonist), picrotoxin (GABAAR antagonist), THIP (GABACR antagonist and partial GABAAR agonist) and TPMPA (GABACR antagonist) did not affect the control amplitudes or the GABA-induced enhancement. The GABABR-specific agonists SKF97541 and baclofen enhanced the acinar cell response amplitudes. The GABABR antagonists CGP54626 and CGP52432 suppressed the GABA-induced enhancement. Bicuculline also enhanced the cell responses to SDN-stimulation. The mean amplitude of at least two stimulations during GABA-bath application and/or drug treatment was normalized to the mean amplitude of at least two consecutive control stimulations for each experiment. The data were analyzed by applying one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post test. *P<0.05, **P<0.001.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Effects of GABA on the rates of fluid and protein secretion induced by electrical salivary duct nerve (SDN)-stimulation. (A) Experimental regime and fluid secretion induced by electrical SDN-stimulation in the absence (8 V, 0.2 ms stimuli applied at 10 Hz) and presence (8 V, 0.2 ms stimuli applied at 2 Hz) of GABA. 5 µmol l–1 GABA increased the rate of fluid secretion induced by a low frequency of electrical stimuli. After GABA washout the gland was stimulated at a frequency of 10 Hz again to obtain a control for gland functionality. The open rectangle indicates the five saliva samples/time periods that served as control for the protein assay in C. The light gray rectangle labels the five saliva samples/time periods that served as a control for the comparison of the secretion rates in B. The dark gray rectangle indicates the saliva samples/time period when GABA was applied. Application times are indicated by horizontal bars. (B) 5 µmol l–1 GABA increases the rate of fluid secretion 2.5-fold from 6.8±1.1 to 16.7±1.7 nl min–1 (N=7, *P<0,0171). (C) 5 µmol l–1 GABA increases the rate of protein secretion from 2.9±0.7 µg min–1 4-fold to 12±3.8 µg min–1 (N=7, *P=0.03).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009