spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 18, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1463-1474 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.017160
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Brody, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Brody, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mechanical specialization of the obliquely striated circular mantle muscle fibres of the long-finned squid Doryteuthis pealeii

Joseph T. Thompson1,*, John A. Szczepanski2 and Joshua Brody2

1 Department of Biology, Franklin & Marshall College, PO Box 3003, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003, USA
2 Department of Biology, St Joseph's University, 5600 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Mantle morphology. (A) Photograph of a cross section of the formalin-fixed mantle of a juvenile Doryteuthis pealeii. The section was taken approximately from the midpoint along the length of the mantle. The diameter of the mantle is about 25 mm. Ctenidia (Ct), mantle (M), mantle cavity (MC), and viscera (V). (B) A schematic illustrating only the mantle muscles. The circular muscles compose the majority of the mantle musculature but regularly spaced bands of radial muscle fibres (RM) are also present. There are two types of circular muscles: central mitochondria poor (CMP) and superficial mitochondria rich (SMR). The schematic exaggerates the size of the muscle fibres and the proportion of SMR to CMP fibres. In an adult D. pealeii, the outer and inner layers of SMR fibres together compose only 4–6% of the thickness of the mantle wall. (C) A schematic of a muscle preparation illustrating the foil clips and the muscle. The gray ovals represent the cut ends of the radial muscle fibres.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Electron micrographs of cross sections of SMR (A) and CMP (B) circular muscle fibres to illustrate differences in the cells. Note the large core of mitochondria (M) in the SMR fibres and the more extensive sarcoplasmic reticulum (arrows) in the CMP fibres. Scale bars, 2 µm (A); 1 µm (B). (C,D) Electron micrographs of longitudinal sections of the SMR (C) and CMP (D) circular muscle fibres. Scale bar for C and D, 0.5 µm. Note the longer thick filaments (arrows) in the SMR fibre.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Thick filament length in the two types of muscle fibres. The thick filaments of the SMR fibres (black) were significantly longer than those of the CMP fibres (white) (ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test). The box plots illustrate the median (the horizontal line), the upper and lower quartile (the box), and the range of the data (the `whiskers'). There were no outliers. We measured 270 SMR thick filaments and 260 CMP thick filaments from 5 animals. *Significantly different (P<0.001).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Comparison of cross sectional areas of the whole fibre, the core of mitochondria, and the myofilaments between SMR (black) and CMP (white) fibre preparations. The plots illustrate the median (the horizontal line), the upper and lower quartile (the box), and the range of the data (the `whiskers'). There were no outliers. Approximately 40 SMR and 40 CMP fibres were measured from each of five different animals. *Significantly different (P<0.001; ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Force–time relationship in twitch (2 ms pulse, 1 Hz; gray line) and tetanus (2 ms pulse, 400 Hz, 100 ms duration; black line) for CMP (A) and SMR (B) preparations. The tetanus trace in B also illustrates the temporal aspects of force that we measured. The lowest black line illustrates the timing of electrical stimuli. Please note that the scale of the time axis does not permit accurate depiction of the timing of electrical stimuli. TL, latent period, measured as the time from the beginning of the first rectangular pulse stimulation to the initial rise in force; TP, time from the initial rise in force to the peak force; T50, time required for force to fall from the peak to 50% peak.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Variation of peak isometric stress (A) and twitch:tetanus ratio (B) between the two different muscle fibre preparations in tetanus (400 Hz, 100 ms) at 20°C. CMP fibres produced significantly less isometric stress than SMR fibres (P<0.0001; ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test). CMP fibres had a significantly higher twitch:tetanus ratio than SMR fibres (P=0.046; ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test). The numbers above each bar are the mean ± s.d. P0 is reported as mN mm–2 physiological cross section.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Comparison of maximum unloaded shortening velocity (Vmax) in brief tetanus (50 Hz, 100 ms) at 20°C. (A) Slack step test data for one CMP (open circles) and one SMR (filled circles) preparation. (B) Maximum unloaded shortening velocity for the two different muscle fibre preparations. The numbers above each bar are the mean ± s.d. CMP fibres had a significantly higher Vmax than SMR fibres (P=0.0003; ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Comparison of typical active (in brief tetanus) and passive forces for CMP (A) and SMR (B) preparations. Note that the passive force is higher in the SMR than in the CMP preparations.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Illustration of how mantle diameter and thickness change during a jet. The lower schematic slightly exaggerates the increase in mantle wall thickness that occurs as the mantle contracts. ti, initial (i.e. resting) mantle wall thickness; tf, final wall thickness (i.e. at the end of contraction during the exhalant phase of the jet); ri, initial radius of the outer edge of the mantle; rf, the final radius of the outer edge of the mantle.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008