First published online March 28, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1270-1280 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.012005
Changes in the control of gastric motor activity during metamorphosis in the amphibian Xenopus laevis, with special emphasis on purinergic mechanisms
Monika Sundqvist* and
Susanne Holmgren
Department of Zoophysiology, Göteborg University, SE 405 30
Göteborg, Sweden

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. (A,B) Representative trace of the tetrodotoxin (TTX)-insensitive responses
to UTP (100 µmol l–1) in (A) prometamorphic stomach and
(B) metamorphic stomach. (C) Representative trace of the partially
TTX-sensitive response to UTP (100 µmol l–1) in juvenile
stomach. (D,E) TTX (1 µmol l–1) blocks the UTP-induced
decrease in frequency (D, N=9) but not the increase in mean force (E,
N=6) in juvenile stomach. (F) L-NAME (300 µmol
l–1) blocks the UTP-induced decrease in frequency
(N=5) in juvenile stomach. Statistical analysis was performed using
repeated measures one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc
test. Asterisk indicates P<0.05. W, wash-out.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. A schematic overview of the different receptors indicated in this study to
be present in the gut at prometamorphosis, metamorphosis and juvenile stages.
Most receptors seem to be directly situated on the smooth muscle. Plus sign
indicates excitatory neuron, whereas minus sign indicates inhibitory neuron.
Black receptors indicate excitatory effects while grey receptors indicate
inhibitory effects. For possible receptor subtypes see discussion. M,
muscarinic receptor; NK, neurokinin receptor. Other abbreviations as
previously used in the text.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008