spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 28, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1262-1269 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.013474
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckerle, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pörtner, H. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckerle, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pörtner, H. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cold induced changes of adenosine levels in common eelpout (Zoarces viviparus): a role in modulating cytochrome c oxidase expression

L. G. Eckerle, M. Lucassen*, T. Hirse and H. O. Pörtner

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Marine Animal Physiology, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Adenosine levels in blood serum (open circles) and liver (filled circles) of eelpout (Z. viviparus) during 1 or 3 days of cold exposure. The fish were acclimated to 11°C (t=0) and transferred to 4°C. Data points marked by ≤ include samples with adenosine concentration below detection limit. For these samples the detection limit of the method was used for calculations. *Significant difference from other time points; {dagger}significant difference from control (t=0). Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=9–10).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Cellular viability during primary culture of hepatocytes from common eelpout (Z. viviparus). The number of viable cells (circles), expressed relative to the initial cell number, and the fraction of dead cells (triangles) in total cell counts were determined for cells from warm-acclimated animals during primary culture at either 11°C (shaded symbols) or 4°C (open symbols). Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=3).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Activities of CS (A–C) and COX (D–F) in hepatocytes prepared from cold- (white bars) and warm- (grey bars) acclimated eelpout (Z. viviparus). Activities were determined in freshly isolated hepatocytes (A,D; N=4) and in cells after incubation at either 4 or 11°C (B,C,E,F; N=5–8) under control conditions (white bars) or with the addition of adenosine (hatched bars). {alpha}Significant difference between acclimations; *significant difference from the control group incubated at the same temperature; {dagger}significant difference from the corresponding group incubated at 4°C. Values are means ± s.e.m.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Relative expression of CS mRNA and of the different COX subunit mRNAs in hepatocytes of cold- (white bars) and warm- (grey bars) acclimated eelpout (Z. viviparus). Relative amounts of CS (A–C), COX2 (D–F) and COX4 (G–I) mRNA were determined in freshly isolated hepatocytes (A,D,G; N=4) and in cells after incubation at either 4 or 11°C (B,C,E,F,H,I; N=5–8) under control conditions (white bars) or with the addition of adenosine (hatched bars). mRNA levels in equal amounts of total RNA were determined by RPA and normalized to the mean of freshly isolated hepatocytes from warm-acclimated fish. *Significant difference from control group incubated at the same temperature; {dagger}significant difference from corresponding group incubated at 4°C. Values are means ± s.e.m.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Influence of an adenosine receptor antagonist and agonist on adenosine action. COX activities were determined in isolated hepatocytes after 48 or 72 h of incubation and normalized to the mean of the control group. Cells were treated with the adenosine receptor antagonist 8-PT combined with adenosine (ado) or with the adenosine agonist NECA instead of adenosine and are compared to their analogous control and adenosine-treated groups. All reagents were supplied at a concentration of 100 nmol ml–1. Cells were prepared from warm-acclimated Z. viviparus and incubated at 11°C. *Significant difference from control. Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=4–6).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008