spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 28, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1231-1242 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.015248
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coolidge, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Milsom, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coolidge, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Milsom, W. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A comparative analysis of putative oxygen-sensing cells in the fish gill

Emily H. Coolidge, Cosima S. Ciuhandu* and William K. Milsom

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Distribution of serotonergic immunoreactive cells (darkly stained cells) along the filament (F) and lamellae (L) in (A) O. mykiss, (B) C. auratus, (C) H. lacerdae, and (D) H. malabaricus. Scale bars, (A) 200 µm, (B–D) 100 µm. Images were colour-inverted to emphasize bright immunofluorescent structures.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Distribution of 5-HT-IR cells expressed as the average staining intensity (pixels) from lamellar tips (0) to the central axis of the filament (100) in (A) O. mykiss, (B) H. lacerdae, (C) H. malabaricus and (D) C. auratus. Shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval associated with the mean distribution (solid line) for each fish species. (E) Comparison of the mean distribution of 5-HT-IR cells among the four species. Broken line represents the division between lamellae and filament.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Number of 5-HT-IR cells on the filament and lamellae in rainbow trout (O. mykiss), trairão (H. lacerdae), traira (H. malabaricus) and goldfish (C. auratus). Values are expressed as means ± s.e.m. At least 50 cells per individual and six individuals per species were measured. Letters (a–d) indicate cell counts significantly different from columns labelled with different letters. P50 values are given in the key as good indicators of relative hypoxia tolerance.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Double immunolabelling of serotonin (5-HT, green) and synaptic vesicles (SV2, red) along a single gill filament with multiple lamellae in (A) O. mykiss, (B) C. auratus, (C) H. lacerdae and (D) H. malabaricus. Scale bars, 100 µm. Colocalization appears yellow. Arrowheads indicate non-5-HT-IR but SV2-IR cells and arrows indicate non-SV2-IR but 5-HT-IR cells.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Double immunolabelling of serotonin (5-HT; green) and nerves (using a neuronal marker zn12; red) in longitudinal sections (30 µm thick) of the gill filament and lamellae of (A) O. mykiss, (B) C. auratus, (C) H. lacerdae and (D) H. malabaricus. Images were captured using a confocal scanning system. Inset in B shows close association of nerves (red) and 5-HT-IR cell at the tip of the lamellae of C. auratus.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. TEM images of neuroepithelial cells (NECs) in (A) the filament of O. mykiss and (B) the lamella of C. auratus. Lower left-hand insets (areas indicated by broken red boxes) show the presence of dense-cored vesicles (arrowheads). Note the proximity of NECs in both A and B to a red blood cell (RBC), as well as a nerve (N) and the basal lamina (BL) in A. The NEC of the goldfish lamella (B) is also juxtaposed to a pillar cell (pc) and near the ambient environment (H2O). Scale bars, 500 nm.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Cross sections of gill filaments from (A) O. mykiss, (B) C. auratus, (C) H. lacerdae and (D) H. malabaricus showing double immunolabelling of 5-HT (green) and SV2 (red; Ai–Di) and 5-HT (green) and zn12 (red; Aii–Dii). (E) Schematic of a filament cross section showing the location of the efferent filament artery (eFA), central venous sinus (cvs), afferent filament artery (aFA), lamellar pillar cells (pc) and companion vessels (cv) [adapted from Farrell (Farrell, 1979Go)]. Note that lamellae are rarely sectioned in a straight plane. Scale bars, 100 µm.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Comparison of the tip of the filaments in all four species using antibody immunolabelling of serotonin (5-HT) and synaptic vesicle marker (SV2): (A) O. mykiss, (B) C. auratus, (C) H. lacerdae and (D) H. malabaricus. Colocalization appears yellow. Scale bars, 100 µm.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Innervated serotonergic cells located at the filament tips in (A) O. mykiss, (B) C. auratus, (C) H. lacerdae and (D) H. malabaricus immunolabelled for serotonin (5-HT, green) and a neuronal marker (zn12, red). Scale bars, 25 µm.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. Innervated serotonergic cells located in the gill rakers in (A) O. mykiss and (B) C. auratus immunolabelled for serotonin (5-HT, green) and a synaptic vesicle marker (sv2, red). Insets show magnification of individual cells. Colocalization appears yellow. Arrowheads indicate non-5-HT-IR but SV2-IR cells. Scale bars, 50 µm.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 11. Innervated serotonergic cells located in the gill rakers in (A) O. mykiss and (B) C. auratus immunolabelled for serotonin (5-HT, green) and a neuronal marker (zn12, red). Insets show magnification of innervated 5-HT-IR cells in both trout and goldfish. Scale bars, 50 µm.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 12. Schematic of proposed locations of putative O2 receptor cells in fish gills: gill rakers (R), lamellae (L), tips of filaments (FT) and centre of filament (F) (efferent filament artery). Note that all fish species contain putative O2 receptor cells in at least two of these proposed locations and variation between species seems to be related to hypoxia tolerance.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008