spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 29, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 873-882 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.006031
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Trimmer, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woods, W. A., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Trimmer, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dynamic properties of a locomotory muscle of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta during strain cycling and simulated natural crawling

William A. Woods, Jr*, Steven J. Fusillo and Barry A. Trimmer

Tufts University, Department of Biology, Dana Laboratories, 163 Packard Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. (A) Lateral view of M. sexta showing location of the ventral interior lateral muscle (VIL) of the third abdominal segment. (B) VIL and other body wall muscles of the larva of the moth Hyalophora cecropia, with the innermost muscles shown frontmost in the drawing. From Beckel (Beckel, 1958Go).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Time course of force development by the ventral interior lateral muscle (VIL) under tetanic stimulus at resting length. An example is shown of a typical force response to a 30 V, 20 Hz stimulus train for 2 s, beginning at 1 s in the figure. Peak stress of 138.6±74.2 kPa (mean ± s.d.) was reached in 2.22±1.33 s (N=19); individual muscle preparations reached 80% of their peak force in 0.56±0.24 s.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Peak tetanic force of the ventral interior medial muscle versus length. Different symbols represent four different muscle preparations. Fitted curve is a four-parameter Weibull nonlinear regression (r2=0.48, P<0.0001). Peak force increased linearly by more than threefold as strain increased from about 60 to 108% of in vivo resting muscle length. Optimal length for force production (Lo) was about 108% of resting length. Muscles produced 90% or more of maximum force at lengths from about 80 to 135% of Lo, and 60% or more at lengths from about 60 to 160% of Lo.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Work loops of the ventral interior lateral muscle under sinusoidal cycling from 80% to 120% of in vivo resting muscle length. Broken lines are for passive muscle and solid lines are for muscle under sustained stimulation. Data shown are for the fourth of five strain cycles at each cycling frequency.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. The ratio of passive to active work loop area of VIL (see Fig. 4) was associated with sinusoidal strain cycling frequency [ratio=0.0425 log(cycling frequency)+0.220; N=4, r2=0.99]. Data used are of the fourth of five concurrent strain cycles at each cycling frequency.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Resilience of active ventral interior lateral muscle during sinusoidal strain cycling rose exponentially to a maximum at cycling frequencies from 0.5 to 16 Hz (single time constant three-parameter model, r2=0.98, P<0.01). Frequencies of 0.5–2 Hz produce length change velocities representative of those observed in vivo.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. (A) The time course of force increase and decay as the ventral interior lateral (VIL) muscle is stretched from 90 to 110% of in vivo resting length at 0.4 lengths s–1 and held. Force decays exponentially at completion of stretching (see Fig. 8). (B) Detail of A showing the transition in the rate of force increase during the constant velocity stretch.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. (A) Mean peak force (fp) reached at end of constant velocity stretching of the third abdominal segment ventral interior lateral muscle from 90 to 110% of resting length was associated with stretch velocity (v) by the relationship fp=0.480v0.141 (N=5, r2=0.997, P<0.0001). (B) Mean time constant ({tau}) of force decay from the peak values shown in A with the muscle held at 110% of resting length was associated with stretch velocity (v) by the relationship {tau}=0.504v0.255, N=5, r2=0.99, P<0.0001). Values are means ± 1 s.e.m.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Mean stress during the transition (st; see Fig. 7B) was associated with stretch velocity (v) of the ventral interior lateral muscle by the relationship st=0.0161v+0.0158 (N=5, P<0.001). Values are means ± 1 s.e.m. Despite considerable variation between individual muscle preparations, r2 values of the stress vs stretch velocity relationship for individual muscles were all >0.90 and averaged 0.97.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. (A) Length (broken trace) and instantaneous spike frequency (ISF; solid trace) of the third abdominal segment ventral interior lateral muscle during horizontal crawling. The ISF represents the frequency of excitatory junction potential events as characterized by EMGs of stimulated muscles obtained from in vitro preparations. (B) Differentiated voltage from which the ISF values in A were obtained.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 11. (A) Time course of force and length of a 4.6 mm third abdominal segment ventral interior lateral muscle subjected to a simplified concensus crawling strain cycle and stimulus. The muscle is shortened by 28% in 0.95 s and re-lengthened in 0.87 s. Time course of force development by the same muscle preparation under tetanic stimulus is shown in Fig. 2. (B) Work loop during the crawling cycle in A. The loop does not close during strain cycling, but force returns to nearly starting values during a time interval representative of that seen between strain cycles in Fig. 10A.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 12. The effect of varying stimulus phase or duration during in vitro crawling cycles. (A) Varying the timing of the 0.68 s stimulus by as little as 0.2 s, about 10% of the strain cycle duration, resulted in no positive work being done by the same muscle preparation as in Figs 2 and 11. (B) Varying stimulus duration from 0.28 to 1.08 s for a 3.6 mm VIL while holding the timing of the stimulus midpoint at the same value as in A and in Fig. 11 resulted in positive work being done for a portion of the strain cycle in both cases, as well as for intermediate stimulus duration values (not shown).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008