spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 17, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 3359-3369 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.020917
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tytell, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lauder, G. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tytell, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lauder, G. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Hydrodynamics of the escape response in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus

Eric D. Tytell1,* and George V. Lauder2

1 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
2 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. (A) Top view of filming and laser configuration, approximately to scale. Laser light sheets from two lasers (`laser 1' and `laser 2') oriented at 90 deg. to each other were used to avoid shadows. Particle motion was filmed from below. The ventral camera is not shown but its field of view is indicated by a square. Both cameras acquired images synchronously at 1000 fps, with 1024x1024 resolution for ventral camera and 1280x512 for lateral camera. The location of the stimulus is shown with a white circle. A lateral camera was used to determine the position of the fish in the light sheet. A slow flow from left to right was used so that the fish would maintain a consistent orientation. (B,C) Example images from the ventral camera (B) and lateral camera (C). Note that in the lateral view, C, only a portion of the fish's upper body can be seen in the bright laser light.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Number of trials with the laser light sheet at four different dorso–ventral positions. Light sheet height was measured at half the body length of the fish at the end of stage one. Inset shows the light sheet angles that varied slightly as individual fish were slightly tilted in some of the sequences. Different colors represent different individuals. A silhouette of the fish is shown in the background as a guide to the light sheet positions, so that the width of each bar represents the approximate range of positions.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Distribution of fish mass. (A,B) Fraction of total fish mass in transverse (A) or horizontal (B) slices. Dotted lines indicate the approximate thickness of each slice. (C) Estimated mass distribution across the fish body. Color indicates the mass per lateral area, normalized by the fish's mass m and the length L.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Kinematics from a typical C-start. (A) Silhouettes of the body in its initial position (black), at the end of stage one (gray) and at the end of stage two (open). The location of the center of mass (COM) over time is shown with a red line with dots every five milliseconds. White crosses mark the initial position and positions of stage one and stage two. (B) Velocity of the center of mass over time. Divisions between stage one and two are shown with dotted lines. (C) Angular velocity of the head over time.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (210K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Images of a typical bluegill sunfish C-start showing the associated hydrodynamic flows at the mid-body level (yellow velocity vectors). Note that only every fourth vector is shown for clarity. The stimulus is visible in the lower left of each panel, and the three dominant jet flows are labeled (see text for discussion). The strong suction on the inside of the C-bend is clearly visible in panel B. Note that jet one represents momentum that largely opposed the fish momentum along the final trajectory. Vectors in the region of the stimulus in the lower left corner of each panel and over the fish body have been deleted. The bluegill icon at the bottom indicates the position of the light sheet (black line) in this sequence and a time-line for this sequence is shown. Peak flow velocities are nearly 1 ms–1. In this escape, stage one lasted for 32 ms and stage two for 25 ms, therefore, the whole escape lasted 57 ms.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. C-start escape responses showing flows resulting from motion of the dorsal (A) and anal (B) fins. Bluegill icons at the top of each panel indicate the position of the light sheet (black line) for each panel. The stimulus generating the escape was just off the lower left corner of each image. Both images are from the end of stage one. (A) Jet one and the dorsal fin portion of jet two are shown. The protruding fin is the anal fin. (B) The anal fin portion of jet two is shown. Jet one is not visible because the light sheet for this trial was located just below the caudal fin. In both panels, every second vector is shown for clarity.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Flow and vorticity for a fast start with the light sheet intersecting the lower body. Vectors show the flow with brighter green colors indicating high velocity. Red and blue colors indicate counter-clockwise and clockwise vorticity, respectively. Broken ovals with numbers show the outlines of identified jets. The fish silhouette is shown in gray. The inset shows the light sheet position on the body. The time starting from the first visible movement is shown at the top of each panel, and a time-line for this escape is shown at the bottom right.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Fluid momentum matches the fish momentum parallel to the final trajectory. Momentum in each jet is shown for stage one (solid bars) and stage two (open bars) with error bars representing standard error. Numbers in each bar represent the number of sequences used to estimate momentum and are the same for both parallel (A) and perpendicular (B) estimates. The bar labeled `All jets' represents the sum of the mean momentum values for each body jet and the dorsal and anal fin jets. Momentum is scaled to the fish's momentum M at the end of stage two. (A) Momentum parallel to the final fish trajectory. The bars for jet three are shown offset from one another to indicate that parallel momentum in that jet decreased from stage one to stage two. (B) Momentum perpendicular to the final fish trajectory. Note that the perpendicular fish momentum at the end of stage two is zero by definition explaining why no open bar is shown.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. The force that produced jet two (i.e. the change in jet two momentum) typically had two peaks, one in stage one and another in stage two. (A) Example force trace showing the two peaks, identified with open circles. Stage one and two are separated by dotted lines. Outlines showing body conformation during the C-start are shown in the middle of the graph. The mean force required to give the fish its final momentum is shown as a broken line. Time zero is the time of first visible movement. (B) Mean values of the stage one and two peak forces (open circles in A) for all trials. Force has been normalized by the mean force (broken line in A) for each trial.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. Summary of jet and fish momentum for body trials. Jets are shown in blue; each line represents the magnitude and angle of a jet, radiating from the mean position of the jet. Mean angle and momentum is shown with a black arrow. Fish momentum is shown in a similar way with red lines radiating from the fish's center of mass and a black arrow to indicate the mean. Fish silhouettes are shown in gray. All vectors are scaled as a fraction of the final fish momentum at the end of stage two (E). Data are for body jets, as indicated by the inset.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 11. Fluid momentum perpendicular to the fish's final trajectory reduces the fish's total momentum. The fish momentum at the end of stage two is plotted against the fraction of perpendicular jet momentum in the total momentum. Mjet,i is the perpendicular component of jet momentum, and the operators max(·) and ||·|| indicate the maximum value over time and the vector magnitude, respectively.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008