spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online September 19, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 3195-3204 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.019968
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nealon, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Else, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nealon, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Else, P. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Systematic differences in membrane acyl composition associated with varying body mass in mammals occur in all phospholipid classes: an analysis of kidney and brain

Jessica R. Nealon1,2, Stephen J. Blanksby3, Todd W. Mitchell1,2 and Paul L. Else1,2,*

1 Metabolic Research Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia 2522
2 School of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia 2522
3 School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia 2522


Figure 1
View larger version (612K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. A comparison of the type and concentration of the three most common glycerophospholipid classes (A) phosphatidylcholine (PC), (B) phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and (C) phosphatidylserine (PS) present in mouse, sheep and cow kidney. Statistical analysis for differences in the concentration of these phospholipids in kidney between the three mammal species is provided in Table 2. Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=4).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (624K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. A comparison of the type and concentration of the three most common glycerophospholipid classes (A) phosphatidylcholine (PC), (B) phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and (C) phosphatidylserine (PS) present in mouse, sheep and cow brain. Statistical analysis for the differences in the concentration of these phospholipids in brain between the three mammal species is provided in Table 2. Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=4).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008