spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 22, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2807-2816 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.020172
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orr, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lukowiak, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Orr, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lukowiak, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparing memory-forming capabilities between laboratory-reared and wild Lymnaea: learning in the wild, a heritable component of snail memory

Michael V. Orr, Karla Hittel and Ken Lukowiak*

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1


Figure 1
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. (A) Laboratory-reared snail performing aerial-respiratory behavior at the air–water interface. Note that the markings on the dorsal shell are utilized in the laboratory for identifications purposes. (B) A wild Lymnaea stagnalis aerial-respiring in its native habitat. The bars indicate that the wild snail is approximately twice the size of the laboratory snail.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Behavioral response of wild Belly (left black bars) and laboratory snails (descendents of wild Dutch snails; right white bars) after a single 0.5 h training session (TS). (A) Operant conditioning of wild Belly snails results in an LTM that persists for 24 and 72 h (24 h TM, N=53, P<0.05; 72 h TM, N=23, P<0.05). Yoked control snails do not demonstrate memory at these same time periods (faded bars; 24 h yoke, N=26, P=0.36; 72 h yoke, N=25, P=0.45). Snails did not demonstrate memory after 1 week (1 week TM, N=32, P=0.24). (B) Laboratory snails do not demonstrate LTM after a single 0.5 h training session (TS; 24 h TM, N=30, P=0.55; 24 h yoke, N=15, P=0.42). All results shown as means + s.e.m. **P<0.001.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Behavioral response of wild Dutch snails after a single 0.5 h training session (TS). Wild Dutch snails do not demonstrate LTM when tested 24 h after operant conditioning (left light-gray bars, 24 h TM, N=22, P=0.60). Yoked controls do not demonstrate altered behavior after conditioning (right faded-black bar, 24 h yoked, N=16, P=0.57). Results are shown as means + s.e.m.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Behavioral response of Belly F1 snails after a single 0.5 h training session (TS). Operant conditioning of Belly F1 snails results in an LTM that persists for 24 and 72 h (24 h TM, N=26, P<0.05; 72 h TM, N=26, P<0.05). Yoked control snails do not demonstrate memory at these same time periods (faded-black bars, 24 h yoke, N=24, P=0.55; 72 h yoke, N=25, P=0.73). Snails did not demonstrate memory after 1 week (1 week TM, N=25, P=0.82). Results are shown as means + s.e.m. **P<0.001.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Representative electrophysiological recordings from RPeD1 in semi-intact preparations taken from wild Dutch and laboratory snails before (naive) and 24 h after operant conditioning. No significant differences were found between any of the measured electrophysiological characteristics (wild Dutch naive, N=8; wild Dutch 24 h, N=8; laboratory-reared Dutch naive, N=9; laboratory-reared Dutch 24 h, N=8).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. RPeD1 activity in wild Belly snails following the single 0.5 h training session. (A) Representative recordings from RPeD1 in wild Belly snails starting at top with a naive snail (naive wild Belly), 24 h after the operant conditioning procedure, 72 h after conditioning, 72 h yoked control and 1 week after conditioning. (B) Summary data for mean (+s.e.m.) spiking activity per 600 s. (C) Number of spikes per burst. (D) Burst duration. (E) Number of bursts per 600 s. In all measured characters presented here, both the 24 h and 72 h operantly conditioned groups demonstrated significantly lower activity than the naive state and are significantly lower than the 72 h yoke and 1 week groups. 72 h yoke and 1 week groups are not significantly different from the naive state. All data represent log-transformed values. *P<0.05; **P<0.001. Naive N=9; 24 h N=9; 72 h N=7; 72 h yoke N=7; and 1 week N=8. No significant differences were detected between treatments in other electrophysiological parameters measured (see Materials and methods).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. RPeD1 activity in Belly F1 snails following the single 0.5 h training session (A) Representative recordings from RPeD1 in Belly F1 snails starting at top with a naive snail (naive Belly F1), 24 h after the operant conditioning procedure, 72 h after conditioning, 72 h yoked control and 1 week after conditioning. (B) Summary data for mean (+s.e.m.) spiking activity per 600 s. (C) Number of spikes per burst. (D) Burst duration. (E) Number of bursts per 600 s. In all measured characters presented here, the 24 h and 72 h operantly conditioned groups both demonstrated significantly lower activity than the naive state (except burst duration at 72 h) and are significantly lower than the 72 h yoke and 1 week groups. 72 h yoke and 1 week groups are not significantly different from the naive state. All data represent log-transformed values. *P<0.05; **P<0.001. Naive N=8; 24 h N=7; 72 h N=7; 72 h yoke N=8; and 1 week N=7. No significant differences were detected between treatments in other electrophysiological parameters measured (see Materials and methods).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008