spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 8, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2617-2623 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.019729
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hildebrandt, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grieshaber, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hildebrandt, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grieshaber, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Redox regulation of mitochondrial sulfide oxidation in the lugworm, Arenicola marina

Tatjana M. Hildebrandt* and Manfred K. Grieshaber

Institut für Zoophysiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Regulation of mitochondrial sulfide oxidation by glutathione (GSH), ascorbate and dehydroascorbate (DHA). (A–C) Initial rates of ATP production (gray circles) and oxygen consumption in state 3 (black circles) and state 4 (black squares) with sulfide (5–100 µmoll–1) added as a substrate. (A) Sulfide oxidation in the absence of redox-competent molecules. (B) Sulfide oxidation in the presence of 2.5 mmoll–1 GSH and 2.5 mmoll–1 ascorbate. Oxygen consumption rates were identical in the presence and in the absence of ADP. (C) Sulfide oxidation in the presence of 1 mmoll–1 DHA. *Significantly different (P>0.05) from corresponding data points without redox competent molecules. (D–F) Inhibition (%) of mitochondrial respiration (black bars) and ATP production (grey bars) with sulfide added as a substrate by 5 µmoll–1 myxothiazole, 0.05 mmoll–1 KCN, 1 mmoll–1 NaN3 or 0.5 mmoll–1 SHAM. (D) Inhibition of oxygen consumption (state 3) and ATP production with 5–10 µmoll–1 sulfide added as a substrate in the absence of redox-competent molecules. (E) Inhibition of oxygen consumption with 10–100 µmoll–1 sulfide added as a substrate in the presence of 2.5 mmoll–1 GSH and 2.5 mmoll–1 ascorbate. ATP production rates were too low to study the effects of inhibitors. (F) Inhibition of oxygen consumption (state 3) and ATP production with 5–50 µmoll–1 sulfide added as a substrate in the presence of 1 mmoll–1 DHA. Data are given as means ± s.d. of the results from 3 to 12 different preparations, each comprising approximately 10–15 animals.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Original recordings of (A) oxygen concentrations (µmoll–1) and (B) ATP concentration (µmoll–1) calculated from the NADPH absorbance at 340 nm in mitochondrial suspensions from body wall tissue of Arenicola marina. (A) Effect of redox-competent molecules on oxygen consumption with sulfide as a substrate. The assays contained 0.45 mg ml–1 mitochondrial protein and either 1 mmoll–1 dehydroascorbate (DHA) (trace 2) or 2.5 mmoll–1 GSH plus 2.5 mmoll–1 ascorbate (trace 3). The reactions were started by the addition of 50 µmoll–1 sulfide. In the presence of DHA, the oxygen consumption rate could be stimulated by ADP. (B) Activation of ATP production with 50 µmoll–1 sulfide as a substrate by DHA. The amount of mitochondrial protein present was 0.16 mg ml–1. Additions are indicated by arrows.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Dehydroascorbate (DHA) protects mitochondrial respiration with malate as a substrate from inhibition by sulfide. Oxygen consumption rates of mitochondria from the body wall tissue of Arenicola marina as a function of time. Additions (indicated by arrows) were 8 mmoll–1 malate and 1 mmoll–1 ADP. Subsequently 1 mmoll–1 DHA was added only to the assay shown by the black line at the time marked with X. The injection of 50 µmoll–1 sulfide inhibited malate respiration in the absence of DHA (gray line) and, by contrast, stimulated the oxygen consumption rate in the presence of DHA (black line).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Original recordings of oxygen concentrations (µmoll–1) in mitochondrial suspensions from body wall tissue of Arenicola marina. Additions of 4 mmoll–1 succinate, 1 mmoll–1 ADP, 5 mmoll–1 glutathione (GSH), 1 mmoll–1 NaN3 and 50 µmoll–1 sulfide are marked with arrows. Mitochondrial protein: (A) 0.53·mg ml–1, (B) 0.48 mg ml–1, (C) 0.35 mg ml–1.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Mitochondrial oxygen consumption (% of oxygen consumption rate at air saturation) as a function of oxygen concentration (µmoll–1). State 3 respiration was recorded with 8 mmoll–1 malate added as a substrate in the presence of 0.5 mmoll–1 salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM) (black dots) and with 50 µmoll–1 sulfide added as a substrate in the presence of 1 mmoll–1 DHA (open squares) or in the presence of 2.5 mmoll–1 GSH + 2.5 mmoll–1 ascorbate (gray circles). Mitochondria were allowed to completely consume the oxygen contained in the respiration medium, thus providing respiration rates at variable oxygen concentrations.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Proposed model of the two different pathways for sulfide oxidation in the mitochondria of Arenicola marina. A membrane-bound sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) oxidizes sulfide (H2S) to persulfides (R-SSH; R=cysteine residue of the SQR) and transfers the electrons to the ubiquinone pool (Theissen and Martin, 2008Go). In the presence of GSH and ascorbate, representing reducing cellular conditions, a pathway of sulfide detoxification is activated (A). Electrons are transferred to oxygen via an alternative oxidase (AOX) without proton translocation. The energy-conserving sulfide oxidation pathway can be activated by dehydroascorbate (DHA) in vitro (B). Electrons are channelled to oxygen through the classical respiratory chain complexes III and IV, which transport protons across the membrane, thus allowing ATP production by complex V (ATP synthase). Inhibitors used in this study are specified above their target enzymes.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008