spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 14, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2460-2466 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.018143
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magnoni, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magnoni, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.-M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In vivo regulation of rainbow trout lipolysis by catecholamines

Leonardo Magnoni*, Eric Vaillancourt and Jean-Michel Weber

Biology Department, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Control experiments showing the effect of vehicle saline infusion (shaded area, filled circles) on (A) glycerol concentration in plasma, (B) specific activity (SA) and (C) rate of appearance (Ra glycerol) in resting trout. Measurements were made by continuous infusion of [3H]glycerol. No significant differences were found (P>0.05). Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=4).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effects of exogenous norepinephrine (NE) infusion (shaded area, filled circles) on (A) glycerol concentration in plasma, (B) specific activity (SA) and (C) rate of appearance (Ra glycerol) in resting trout. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P<0.001) from baseline values determined at 90 min. Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=8).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Effects of exogenous epinephrine (Epi) infusion (shaded area, filled circles) on (A) glycerol concentration in plasma, (B) specific activity (SA) and (C) rate of appearance (Ra glycerol) in resting trout. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P<0.001) from baseline values determined at 90 min. Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=8).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Relationship between glycerol turnover (Ra glycerol) and glycerol concentration in resting trout during administration of saline (stars), norepinephrine (unfilled circles) or epinephrine (filled circles). Only values measured during the final 10 min of administration of saline, epinephrine and norepinephrine are included (110–120 min in Figs 1, 2, 3). Lines were fitted by linear regression for saline (y=4.326–0.375x), continuous line, r2=0.03, slope not different from 0 (P=0.905); for norepinephrine (y=2.750+0.860x), broken line, r2=0.05, slope not different from 0 (P=0.830); and for epinephrine (y=4.286+5.944x), dotted line, r2=0.48, slope different from 0 (P<0.05). Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=4 for saline and N=8 for catecholamines).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Ratio of lipolytic rate (Ra glycerol) over metabolic rate (MO2) for vertebrates measured to date. Values correspond to vertebrates at rest and during exercise at equivalent intensities (40–70% MO2,max), except for birds, where only data for shivering are available (Vaillancourt and Weber, 2007Go). Ratios were calculated from the following studies: rat (McClelland et al., 2001Go), goat (Weber et al., 1993Go), dog (Issekutz et al., 1967Go; Issekutz et al., 1975Go), human (Wolfe et al., 1990Go), ruff sandpiper (Vaillancourt and Weber, 2007Go) and trout [present study and Bernard et al. (Bernard et al., 1999Go) using MO2 values from Burgetz et al. (Burgetz et al., 1998Go)]. The broken line shows the calculated average ratio for resting and exercising endotherms (0.016).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008