spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 14, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2431-2441 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.017285
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ter Hofstede, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fullard, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ter Hofstede, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fullard, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The neuroethology of song cessation in response to gleaning bat calls in two species of katydids, Neoconocephalus ensiger and Amblycorypha oblongifolia

Hannah M. ter Hofstede* and James H. Fullard

Biology Department, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Oscillograms of the calling song of (A) Neoconocephalus ensiger and (B) Amblycorypha oblongifolia at a time scale typical for the period of A. oblongifolia.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Percentage of individuals per threshold sound intensity producing a response (song pausing or cessation) for (A) a gleaning echolocation sequence and (B) a search call echolocation sequence, and song cessation for (C) a gleaning echolocation sequence and (D) a search call echolocation sequence. NT, no threshold, indicating that the katydid continued to sing after the final 90 dB peSPL stimulus.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. T-cell responses to pulsed sound in katydids. (A) Synchronized oscillograms of a double electrode recording from Amblycorypha oblongifolia. Top trace: descending ipsilateral connective from the prothoracic ganglion; middle trace: ascending ipsilateral connective from the prothoracic ganglion; bottom trace: microphone recording of the sound stimulus (a 10 ms 25 kHz pulse). (B) Audiogram curves of threshold T-cell responses to 10 ms pulses for Amblycorypha oblongifolia (N=12) and Neoconocephalus ensiger (N=17). Asterisks indicate significant differences between species (t-tests, P<0.0025).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Mean number of T-cell action potentials for each echolocation sequence and mean of the five greatest instantaneous spike rates per intensity for Neoconocephalus ensiger and Amblycorypha oblongifolia. Black lines: Myotis septentrionalis gleaning attack echolocation sequence; grey lines: M. septentrionalis search call sequence. Bars indicate ± s.e.m. B, background activity (see Materials and methods). Different letters indicate significant differences between activity levels.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Maximum T-cell instantaneous rate (s–1) for 100 ms time bins across the first 1 s of the 85 dB peSPL Myotis septentrionalis search calls (squares) and Teleogryllus oceanicus calls (circles) for (A) Neoconocephalus ensiger (N=10) and (B) Amblycorypha oblongifolia (N=10). Bars indicate ± s.e.m.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Relationship between T-cell best frequency (frequency with the lowest intensity threshold) and peak frequency of the calling song for 13 species of Tettigoniidae. Sources: Neoconocephalus ensiger (Faure and Hoy, 2000bGo); Amblycorypha rotundifolia (Forrest et al., 2006Go); Acripeza reticulata, Caedicia longipennis, Mygalopsis marki (Hill and Oldfield, 1981Go); Decticus sp. (Nebeling, 2000Go); Neoconocephalus retusus (Schul and Sheridan, 2006Go); Phaneroptera falcata (Schul et al., 2000Go); Ancistrura nigrovittata (Stumpner and Molina, 2006Go); Conocephalus saltator, Drepanoxiphus modestus, Phlugis sp. 1 and sp. 2 (Suga, 1966Go).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008