spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 13, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2014-2025 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.016931
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies

Yanpeng Liu* and Mao Sun

Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Model of trinocular stereo vision system. (XW YW ZW), the world coordinate system; (XC1 YC1 ZC1), (XC2 YC2 ZC2) and (XC3 YC3 ZC3), the camera coordinate systems of cameras 1, 2 and 3, respectively; (u1 v1), (u2 v2) and (u3 v3), image coordinate systems of camera 1, 2 and 3, respectively. P, an arbitrary point; p1, p2 and p3, the projective points and f1, f2 and f3, the focal length of cameras 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. (A) Wing model. (B) Example of frames recorded by the three cameras. See text for details.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Definitions of morphological parameters of wing and body. h1, distance from wing-root axis to long-axis of body; l1, distance from wing-root axis to body center of mass; lr, distance between two wing roots; lb, body length.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. A portion of the computation grid of the dronefly wing.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Definitions of the angles of a flapping wing that determine the wing orientation. (X Y Z), coordinates in a system with its origin at the wing root and with Z-axis points to the side of the insect and X–Z plane coincides with the stroke plane. {phi}, the positional angle; {alpha}, geometrical angle of attack; {theta}, deviation angle.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Instantaneous wing kinematics of DF1 in hovering. {phi}, the positional angle; {alpha}, geometrical angle of attack; {theta}, deviation angle.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Wing kinematics of DF1. {phi}, positional angle; {alpha}, geometrical angle of attack; {theta}, deviation angle; Formula 4, non-dimensional time.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Time courses of the computed force and moment coefficients in one cycle. Formula 4, non-dimensional time; CV and CH, vertical and horizontal force coefficients, respectively; CM, coefficient for pitching moment about the center of mass; CL and CD, wing lift and drag coefficients, respectively.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Vorticity plots at Formula 42 at various times during one cycle. Solid and broken lines indicate positive and negative vorticity, respectively. The magnitude of the non-dimensional vorticity at the outer contour is 2 and the contour interval is 3. Formula 4, non-dimensional time.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. Time courses of power. CP, non-dimensional power; Cp,a and Cp,j, non-dimensional aerodynamic and inertial power, respectively.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 11. (A) Wing-tip trajectory of DF1; (B) that of a fruit fly [plotted using data from Fry et al. (Fry et al., 2005Go)] (B). {phi}, the positional angle; {theta}, deviation angle.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 12. Wing kinematics data. (A–C); fruit fly (data from Fry et al., 2005Go). (D–F); dronefly DF1. {phi}, the positional angle; {alpha}, geometrical angle of attack; {theta}, deviation angle; Formula 4, non-dimensional time

 

Figure 13
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 13. Vertical force of fruit flies over the course of a stroke cycle (Fry et al., 2005Go).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 14. Time course of power [plotted using data from Fry et al. (Fry et al., 2005Go)]; red solid line, total mechanic power; blue broken line, aerodynamic power component; green broken dot line, inertial power component.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008