First published online May 30, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1937-1947 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.014217
The effect of proline on the network structure of major ampullate silks as inferred from their mechanical and optical properties
Ken N. Savage and
John M. Gosline*
Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6K 1Z4

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. The consensus sequences for the fibroins expressed in the MA glands of
Nephila clavipes and Araneus diadematus, as presented in
Gatsey et al. (Gatsey et al., 2001). Nc-MA-1 is spidroin-1 type and Nc-MA-2 is
spidroin-2 type. Ad-MA-1 and Ad-MA-2 are both spidroin-2 type and were
previously called ADF-3 and ADF-4 by Guerette et al.
(Guerette et al., 1996 ). The
percentage values at the end of each sequence give the relative size of the
poly-alanine block and the percentage proline in each consensus repeat.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. A conceptual model representing the distribution of hydrogen bond energies
contained within proline-rich (+Pro) Araneus and proline-deficient
(–Pro) Nephila MA silk networks. Green peaks represent bond
energies in poly-alanine β-sheet crystals; black peaks represent bond
energies in the network chains in Araneus silk, and red peaks
represent bond energies in the network chains in Nephila MA silk.
(A,B) Two possible scenarios for the bond energy distributions of the silks in
the dry state. In A the distribution of hydrogen bond energies in +Pro and
–Pro networks are not sufficiently different to be detected in the dry
mechanics. In B the difference in hydrogen bond energies between +Pro and
–Pro networks is sufficiently large that there are significant
differences in the dry mechanics. According to both dry models, the peaks
associated with hydrogen-bonded structures are well above the energy
associated with Brownian motion, kT, and thus represent stable structures. (C)
Hydration weakens the hydrogen bond strengths of the +Pro networks, and
consequently the +Pro peak shifts to levels that are near or below kT. It is
unclear where on this scale the –Pro peak might shift; however, if it
remains above kT, we hypothesize that there would be a difference in the
properties of hydrated MA silks. The poly-alanine β-sheet crystals are
stable both in the dry and hydrated state, and it is unclear if the crystals
`soften' in the presence of water. We arbitrarily shifted the poly-alanine
peak to the left slightly, but the position well to the right of kT indicates
that the poly-alanine crystals are quite stable in water.
|
|

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Typical tensile test data for dry MA silk collected from Araneus
and Nephila. Traces were chosen to demonstrate the range of data
collected. Dashed traces are data from Nephila, unbroken traces are
data from A. diadematus. The black circle represents the mean failure
stress and strain for Araneus with error bars representing one
standard deviation. The black square represents the same values for
Nephila. Each sample was from a different spider.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Supercontracted properties of Araneus MA silk. Note that the
individual samples were not tested to failure, but to the highest strain
possible with each experimental setup. (A) The complete data set; (B) the
average behaviour of the data set. Predicted values were averaged from all the
curves for which a value was available. Filled circles represent values
averaged from all 12 tests and open circles represent values averaged from all
tests for which a value at that extension was available. The numbers above
each data point are the number of curves included in the average. The
calculated average behaviour is fitted to the fourth order polynomial,
450.05x4–310.64x3+109.49x2–4.29x+0.22,
r2=1. Error bars are one standard deviation. Each sample
was from a different spider.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Supercontracted properties of Nephila MA silk. Note that the
individual samples were not tested to failure, but to the highest strain
possible with each experimental setup. (A) The completed data set; (B) the
average behaviour of the data set. Predicted values were averaged from all the
curves for which a value was available. Filled squares represent values
averaged from all 24 tests and open squares represent values averaged from all
tests for which a value at that extension was available. The numbers above
each data point are the number of curves included in the average. The
calculated average curve is fitted to a third order polynomial,
266.23x3+81.42x2+89.11x–2.21,
r2=0.97. Error bars are one standard deviation. Each
sample was from a different spider.
|
|

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. The average stress–strain behaviour presented in
Fig. 4B (Araneus) and
Fig. 5B (Nephila) are
presented on the same axis for the purposes of direct comparison. Squares
represent Nephila MA silk and circles represent Araneus MA
silk. As for Figs 4 and
5, filled symbols represent
values from all tests for which a value was available, and open symbols
represent values from all tests that were available at that extension. The
average Nephila MA silk behaviour is stiffer and the stress rises
more quickly with increasing extension than is the case with Araneus
MA silk.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. (A) The instantaneous modulus of MA silk is plotted against strain. The
Araneus curve is difficult to distinguish from the axis because of
the relatively high modulus of Nephila. (B) To better distinguish the
Nephila and Araneus curves, the data from A is plotted as
log modulus versus strain. The solid squares indicate the initial
stiffness of Nephila silk, and the solid circles indicate the initial
stiffness of Araneus silk.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Birefringence measurements versus strain for supercontracted MA
silk from Araneus. (A) The complete data set and (B) the average
behaviour of the data set. Predicted values were averaged from all the curves
for which a value was available. Filled circles represent values averaged from
all nine tests and open circles represent values averaged from all tests for
which a value at that extension was available. The numbers above each data
point represent the number of curves included in the average. The calculated
curve is fitted to the second order polynomial,
y=0.0122x+0.0070, r2=0.99. Error bars
are one standard deviation. Each sample was from a different spider.
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. Birefringence measurements versus strain for supercontracted MA
silk from Nephila (A)The complete data set and (B) the average
behaviour of the data set. Predicted values were averaged from all the curves
for which a value was available. Filled squares represent values averaged from
all seven tests and open squares represent values averaged from all tests for
which a value at that extension was available. The numbers above each data
point represent the number of curves included in the average. The calculated
average behaviour is fitted to the linear regression,
y=0.0456x2+0.0197, r2=1.
Error bars are one standard deviation. Each sample was from a different
spider.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10. The average birefringence curves in Fig.
7B (Araneus) and Fig.
4B (Nephila) are presented on the same axis for direct
comparison.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008