spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 2, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1612-1622 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.013029
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horner, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jayne, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horner, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jayne, B. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The effects of viscosity on the axial motor pattern and kinematics of the African lungfish (Protopterus annectens) during lateral undulatory swimming

Angela M. Horner* and Bruce C. Jayne

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210006, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0006, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Ventral view of EMG locations (A) and lateral view of fish shape (B). A ventral mirror view was used to reconstruct the lungfish outline and midline, which was then partitioned into segmental lengths determined from radiographs. The large vertical bar indicates the location of the border between the body and the tail. The numbers indicate average anatomical locations for red muscle EMG sites (see Table 1), with bilateral sites denoted by asterisks. White muscle sites are indicated parenthetically.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Grand means of speed (A), cycle duration (B) and distance traveled per cycle (C) for each viscosity. Despite regular patterns of change in speed and distance per cycle, only cycle duration was significantly affected by viscosity (see Table 3). L, length.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Series of lungfish midlines for one cycle from the same individual with viscosities and swimming speeds of (A) 1 cSt, 0.20 L s–1, (B) 10 cSt, 0.23 L s–1, (C) 100 cSt, 0.14 L s–1 and (D) 1000 cSt, 0.15 L s–1, respectively. Note that lateral displacement and lateral bending increased most conspicuously anteriorly with increased viscosity.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effects of viscosity and longitudinal location on the mean values of kinematics and muscle activity. (A) Lateral vertebral flexion (βmax) is the maximum attained within a cycle. For a single viscosity, flexion was always greatest in posterior sites, but with increased viscosity the largest change in flexion occurred anteriorly. (B) EMG intensity increased significantly with increased viscosity and was commonly greater in more posterior locations. (C) EMG duty factor was nearly constant for all longitudinal sites and viscosities.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. EMGs from superficial red muscle from four ipsliateral longitudinal sites from a single lungfish. EMG amplitude increased most conspicuously with increased viscosity in anterior sites.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. EMGs from superficial red muscle from three longitudinal sites with both left side (L) and right side (R) showing unilateral and alternating motor pattern. As a result of having EMG duty factors less than 50% of a cycle, each longitudinal location briefly lacks muscle activity on either the left or right side of the body.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Comparison of red (r) and white (w) muscle activity in 1 cSt (0.13 L s–1), 10 cSt (0.08 L s–1), 100 cSt (0.13 L s–1) and 1000 cSt (0.16 L s–1) from a single longitudinal location (site 7) in an individual lungfish.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Lateral vertebral flexion (β) and red muscle activity (horizontal bars) from sites 1 (top) to 8 (bottom) versus time for two cycles of an individual lungfish swimming in viscosities of 1, 10, 100 and 1000 cSt, respectively. Bending convex to the left is represented by positive values of β. The circles are raw data, and the lines represent a two-point running average of the raw data. All EMG sites were on the left side of the fish.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Summary of bending and red muscle activity for mean values of four lungfish in viscosities of 1 (A), 10 (B), 100 (C) and 1000 cSt (D). The time of all graphs is standardized to 50% of a cycle when the body at 0.5 L was bent maximally convex towards the side of muscle activity. The horizontal bars indicate the average timing of muscle activity relative to bending at a particular longitudinal location. Muscle activity between maximum convexity and maximum concavity correlates with activity during contractile tissue shortening.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. (A) Lag time between EMG onset and when lateral flexion was maximally convex on the side of muscle activity. (B) Lag time between EMG offset and when lateral flexion was maximally concave on the side of muscle activity. (C) Phase shifts between EMG onset and when lateral flexion was maximally convex on the side of muscle activity. (D) Phase shifts between EMG offset and when lateral flexion was maximally concave on the side of muscle activity. Values of zero for both phase shifts indicate muscle activity during the entire time of fiber shortening. Note that the magnitude of both phase shifts increased significantly with increased viscosity.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008