spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 31, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1335-1349 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02736
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Osmoregulation, ionoregulation and acid–base regulation by the gastrointestinal tract after feeding in the elasmobranch (Squalus acanthias)

Chris M. Wood1,2,3,*, Makiko Kajimura1,3, Carol Bucking1,3 and Patrick J. Walsh2,3,4

1 Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
2 Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA
3 Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre, 100 Pachena Drive, Bamfield, British Columbia, Canada
4 Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. The influence of feeding on the relative mass of the tissue (expressed as g kg–1 body mass) of various segments of the gastrointestinal tract in the dogfish shark – (A) stomach-1 (cardiac stomach), (B) stomach-2 (pyloric stomach) and (C) intestine. The inset bars indicate the mass contributed by the tissue water content, and the differences represent the mass contributed by the tissue dry-matter content. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). Means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05); the same symbols apply to the mass contributed by tissue water content and so have not been repeated.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. The influence of feeding on plasma total CO2 concentration in blood samples drawn by caudal puncture in the dogfish shark. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). Means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. The influence of feeding on the pH of the fluid phase of the gastrointestinal contents in stomach-1 (cardiac stomach), stomach-2 (pyloric stomach), intestine and colon in the dogfish shark. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). Within a compartment, means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. The influence of feeding on total water volumes (expressed as ml kg–1 body mass) of the gastrointestinal contents in stomach-1 (cardiac stomach), stomach-2 (pyloric stomach) and intestine in the dogfish shark. This measurement includes water in both the fluid and solid phases. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). Within a compartment, means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. The influence of feeding on (A) the osmolality and (B) the urea concentration of the fluid phases of the gastrointestinal contents in stomach-1 (cardiac stomach), stomach-2 (pyloric stomach) and intestine in the dogfish shark. Simultaneously measured values in the blood plasma are also shown. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). As points of reference, the dark bars represent the measured values for ambient seawater (SW) (N=4), and the light bars represent the estimated value for the ingested food [N=5; value for osmolality from Holmes and Donaldson (Holmes and Donaldson, 1969Go)]. Significant differences are not marked in A so as to avoid clutter; the only significant differences (P<0.05) within compartments are in plasma osmolality, as indicated by means not sharing the same letter in the following series: a=6 h, 30 h, 360 h; b=20 h, 120 h, 360 h; c=20 h, 60 h, 120 h. In B, within a compartment, means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05). For clarity, x,y refers to stomach-2 and a,b to stomach-1.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. The influence of feeding on (A) sodium, (B) chloride and (C) potassium concentrations of the fluid phases of the gastrointestinal contents in stomach-1 (cardiac stomach), stomach-2 (pyloric stomach) and intestine in the dogfish shark. Simultaneously measured values in the blood plasma are also shown. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). As points of reference, the dark bars represent the measured values for ambient seawater (SW) (N=4), and the light bars represent the measured values for the ingested food (N=5). Within a compartment, means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the plasma compartment in A–C. In C, for clarity, x,y,z refers to stomach-2 and a,b,c to stomach-1.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 7. The influence of feeding on (A) Ca and (B) Mg concentrations of the fluid phases of the gastrointestinal contents in stomach-1 (cardiac stomach), stomach-2 (pyloric stomach) and intestine in the dogfish shark. Simultaneously measured values in the blood plasma are also shown. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). As points of reference, the dark bars represent the measured values for ambient seawater (SW) (N=4), and the light bars represent the measured values for the ingested food (N=5). Within a compartment, means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the plasma compartment in A. In B, for clarity, x,y refers to stomach-2 and a,b to stomach-1.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 8. The influence of feeding on the composition of gall bladder bile in the dogfish shark. Means ± 1 s.e.m. (N=6–8 at each time point). For each parameter, means not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P<0.05). There were no significant differences for K+.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 9. A comparison of the summation of total measured osmolytes in the blood plasma and the fluid phases of stomach-1 (cardiac stomach), stomach-2 (pyloric stomach) and intestine prior to feeding (A) and at 20 h post-feeding (B). Arrows indicate measured osmolalities. (A) Prior to feeding, note the reasonable agreement between total measured osmolytes and measured osmolality in blood plasma, stomach-1 and stomach-2, but not in intestine. (B) After feeding, note continued agreement in blood plasma, but the discrepancies in all three gastrointestinal fluids. Note also the different contributions of urea versus Na++Cl– in the various compartments.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007