First published online January 31, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 655-667 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02664
Extremely high-power tongue projection in plethodontid salamanders
Stephen M. Deban1,*,
James C. O'Reilly2,
Ursula Dicke3 and
Johan L. van Leeuwen4
1 Department of Biology, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, SCA 110, University of
South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
2 Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, 1027
E. 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
3 Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen, 28334 Bremen,
Germany
4 Experimental Zoology Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences
(WIAS), Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The
Netherlands

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. (A) Kinematic profiles from a representative feeding in Hydromantes
genei showing required instantaneous muscle-mass-specific power
versus time in the upper trace, and instantaneous acceleration,
velocity and smoothed and interpolated position versus time in the
lower traces. Open circles in the position trace indicate raw position data,
and the filled circles correspond to the video frames shown in B. (B) Image
sequence of the same feeding from which the kinematics in A were derived.
Scale bar, 1 cm; times (ms) are from the start of tongue projection. Note the
long tongue reach and the peak required power output of over 3000 W
kg1.
|
|

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. (A) Kinematic profiles from a representative feeding of extremely high
power in Bolitoglossa dofleini showing required instantaneous
muscle-mass-specific power versus time in the upper trace, and
instantaneous acceleration, velocity, and smoothed and interpolated position
versus time in the lower traces. Open circles in the position trace
indicate raw position data, which correspond exactly to the video frames shown
in B. (B) Images of the same feeding. Note the extremely high-power values,
and that peak power is achieved early in tongue projection. Times (ms) are
from the start of tongue projection.
|
|

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. (A) Kinematic profiles from a representative feeding in Eurycea
guttolineata showing required instantaneous muscle-mass-specific power
versus time in the upper trace, and instantaneous acceleration,
velocity, and smoothed and interpolated position versus time in the
lower traces. Open circles in the position trace indicate raw position data,
which correspond exactly to the video frames shown in B. (B) Image sequence of
the same feeding. Scale bar, 5 mm; times (ms) are from the start of tongue
projection.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Frequency histograms of all feedings from Hydromantes, Eurycea and
Bolitoglossa, showing number of feedings analyzed with different
levels of required muscle-mass-specific power. In all taxa, most feedings are
over 1000 W kg1, and extremely high power was observed
repeatedly, but less frequently.
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Electromyographs from the subarcualis rectus muscle in four feedings of one
individual of Bolitoglossa dofleini. Traces are aligned at the time
that the tongue first appears at the mouth, marked by the vertical broken
line. Note that EMG activity has nearly ceased by this time and that
considerable modulation occurs in the duration and timing of the EMG
burst.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Scatterplots from 25 feedings in three individuals of Bolitoglossa
dofleini showing least-squares regression lines and coefficients of
determination (r2) of variables that showed a significant
effect of SAR activationprojection delay in the ANCOVA (see text),
plotted here against SAR activationprojection delay: (A) maximum tongue
reach, (B) specific work, (C) maximum velocity, (D) time of maximum velocity
and (E) time of maximum power.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Scatterplots from 25 feedings in three individuals of Bolitoglossa
dofleini showing least-squares regression lines and coefficients of
determination (r2) of variables that showed a significant
effect of SAR EMG area in the ANCOVA, plotted against SAR EMG area: (A)
maximum tongue reach, (B) specific work and (C) maximum velocity.
|
|

View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. (A) Confocal laser microscope image of a cross section of the tongue
projector muscle (m. subarcualis rectus) of Hydromantes genei. The
epibranchial cartilage is in the center, surrounded by short ( 1 mm)
muscle fibers with a variety of orientations. (B) The same image with the
position of the collagenous aponeuroses marked as black lines. All muscle
fibers originate and insert on these aponeuroses. The section is approximately
2 mm in its widest diameter.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007