First published online January 17, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 505-511 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02677
The directional hearing abilities of two species of bamboo sharks
Brandon M. Casper* and
David A. Mann
College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, 140 7th
Avenue South, St Petersburg, FL 33701, USA

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Diagram of the directional shaker table setup. The fifth, mechanical
shaker, which produces the up/down motion (Z-axis) of the dish, is
located under the dish and not visible in this picture. Drawing not to
scale.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. (A) Acceleration raw signals for a stimulus directed in the Z
direction (up/down) as recorded from the three-dimensional accelerometer. (B)
Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) from the white-spotted bamboo shark
Chiloscyllium plagiosum, in response to a 100 Hz signal at six signal
levels. As the signal is decreased in acceleration level (m
s2) the AEP signal also decreases until it is lost in the
noise at 6.03 m s2. (C) 2048-point Fast
Fourier Transform (FFT) of the same AEP for the shark in response to a 100 Hz
sound. The arrow indicates the frequency doubling peak, which occurs at 200
Hz.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Directional hearing thresholds for the white-spotted bamboo shark
Chiloscyllium plagiosum (N=4) and the brown-banded bamboo
shark Chiloscyllium punctatum (N=2), for each of the seven
directions (see text) measured at (A) 20 Hz, (B) 50 Hz, (C) 100 Hz and (D) 200
Hz. Values are means ± s.e.m. There was no significant difference
between any of the directions at any of the frequencies except at 50 Hz for
interactions between the Z and 30° directions and the Z
and 90° directions.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Composite directional shaker audiograms of the white-spotted bamboo shark
Chiloscyllium plagiosum (N=4), the brown-banded bamboo shark
Chiloscyllium punctatum (N=2), and the goldfish
Carassius auratus (N=2). These audiograms are compiled from
the average of all of the thresholds at each of the directions for each
frequency tested. Values are means ± s.e.m. Also plotted is the dipole
audiogram for C. plagiosum (N=4) to compare responses from
different stimuli. The dipole thresholds were significantly lower than the
directional shaker thresholds at 50 and 200 Hz for C. plagiosum.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007