spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 2, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3946-3954 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.010686
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishimatsu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishimatsu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, J. B.

Mudskippers brood their eggs in air but submerge them for hatching

Atsushi Ishimatsu1,*, Yu Yoshida1, Naoko Itoki1, Tatsusuke Takeda2, Heather J. Lee3 and Jeffrey B. Graham3

1 Institute for East China Sea Research, Nagasaki University, Tairamachi, Nagasaki 851-2213, Japan
2 Department of Animal and Marine Bioresource Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
3 Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine and Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0204, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Three-dimensional drawing of a Periophthalmus modestus burrow showing monitoring device positions: O2 electrode (O), endoscope camera (E), tube for gas injection (G), stainless-steel electrodes (S) for impedance measurement (I), and pressure transducer tube connection (T). Thick dotted line above egg chamber shows the level of burrow excavation required for instrumentation. Thin broken line under the egg chamber shows approximate position of the air–water interface.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Relationship between PO2 and PCO2 of Periophthalmus modestus egg-chamber air determined for burrows with egg-guarding males (solid circles) and courting males (open circles). Regression equations are PCO2=2.62–0.11PO2 (r=–0.577, N=20, P=0.008) for burrows with guarding males, and PCO2=1.53–0.05PO2 (r=–0.678, N=12, P=0.015) for burrows with courting males. Slopes are not significantly different from each other (ANCOVA, P=0.141).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Continuous records of Periophthalmus modestus egg-chamber air PO2 (black line) and the timing of the male's egg-chamber visits (indicated by impedance signals, grey spikes) in relation to the tidal cycle. Data acquisition began with the day of instrumentation and continued until egg hatching, initiated by the male on a rising tide (blue triangle). The beginning of day zero is set to the time when a burrow was covered by an incoming tide, following which egg hatching occurred. The initial high PO2 reflects the opening of the egg chamber to air during instrumentation. (A) Record for a burrow regularly covered (blue bars) and uncovered by the tidal oscillation (red lines show the highest tide). (Note: No impedance data for day –3 due to a technical problem.) (B) Record for a burrow located sufficiently high on the mudflat to be continually exposed to air until day zero when the rising tide covered the burrow (blue bar) and hatching occurred (blue triangle).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effect of hypoxic gas injection on egg-chamber PO2 (A,C) and estimated air-adding frequency (B,D) of two male Periophthalmus modestus. (A,B) Burrow instrumented on June 30, 2004. (A) Real-time records of the low-tide increase in egg-chamber PO2 contrasted with the significantly higher (3.2x, P<0.0001, ANCOVA) PO2 increase rate observed over 60 min following hypoxia injection (arrowhead) than at the beginning of the low-tide period with nearly identical initial PO2. (B) An inverse relationship between egg-chamber PO2 and air-adding frequency (fa) as determined for five complete low-tide periods preceding hypoxic-gas injection (solid symbols) and fa after injection (open symbol). Egg-chamber PO2 at the beginning of each 60 min segment is plotted against fa (see Appendix). Regression line equation; fa=1.39PO2–0.872 (P=0.006, r=0.449, the post-hypoxia value is not included in the regression). (C,D) Burrow instrumented on July 29, 2004. (C) Real-time records of egg-chamber PO2. Hypoxia injection (arrowhead) caused 3.2-fold higher PO2 increase than at the beginning of the low-tide period (P<0.0001, ANCOVA). (D) An inverse relationship determined for four low-tide periods and higher fa immediately following hypoxia injection, as in A. Regression line equation; fa=19.68PO2–1.729 (P<0.0001, r=0.881). Solid and open symbols represent data points obtained before and after hypoxic-gas injection, respectively, as in B.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Daily determinations of the hatching percentage of Periophthalmus modestus eggs taken from five intact, air-filled egg chambers (separate lines) that were incubated in the laboratory. Hatching was induced by submerging about 50 eggs removed from the chambers in 50% seawater.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Interior view of Periophthalmus modestus egg chamber. (1) Eggs on the mud wall of a laboratory-incubated chamber (scale bar 1 mm). (2–7) Endoscope video frames documenting hatch-induction behaviour (June 19, 2002). Vertical view is down, through the egg chamber (note glistening monolayer of eggs on the mud wall), to the burrow-water surface. The male appears at the surface with its mouth open, and becomes progressively larger as it moves closer to the camera. Removing mouthfuls of air (3,4,6,7) raises the water level, which immerses the eggs, causing them to hatch. (8) Hatched larvae [average total length 2.84 mm (Kobayashi et al., 1972Go)] swimming in the flooded egg chamber 48 min after frame 7 (see also Movie 1 in supplementary material).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Relationships between tidal height and the timing of hatch induction of Periophthalmus modestus. The horizontal grey bar represents heights of mudflat surface in which openings of P. modestus burrows were located. Different curves show changes in tidal height during the last tidal cycles of egg incubation periods determined for 11 burrows. Curves are adjusted to the peaks of flood tide (time zero). The rectangle encloses the curves for an approximate range in which hatch induction occurred.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007