spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 19, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3830-3837 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.007328
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, C.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tso, I-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, C.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tso, I-M.

Diurnal and nocturnal prey luring of a colorful predator

Chih-Yen Chuang1, En-Cheng Yang2 and I-Min Tso1,3,*

1 Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan
2 Department of Entomology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 105, Taiwan
3 Center for Tropical Ecology and Biodiversity, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan


Figure 1
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of a colorful sit-and-wait predator, the giant wood spider Nephila pilipes (Araneae: Tetragnathidae).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Mean (±s.e.m.) nocturnal achromatic and chromatic contrast values (in arbitrary units, a.u.) of various body parts of Nephila pilipes viewed against green vegetation by lepidopteran insects. BP, black paint used to alter the color signals of body parts 1, 2 and 3. Letters represent results of ANOVA and LSD mean comparisons.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Mean (±s.e.m.) diurnal (A,C) and nocturnal (B,D) insect interception rates of webs of Nephila pilipes in experiments manipulating spider presence (A,B) and color signal (C,D). *P<0.05.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. (A,B) Mean (±s.e.m.) nocturnal prey interception rates of webs of Nephila pilipes in the spider-present (A) and control (B) groups. (C–F) Mean (±s.e.m.) body length of diurnal and nocturnal prey in the spider-present (C), control (D), spider-absent (E) and experimental (F) groups, in the first (C,E) and second (D,F) field experiments. NS, not significant; **P<0.01, ***P<0.0001.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007