First published online October 5, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3525-3537 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.006791
Search for hepatopancreatic ecdysteroid-responsive genes during the crayfish molt cycle: from a single gene to multigenicity
Assaf Shechter1,
Moshe Tom2,
Yana Yudkovski2,
Simy Weil1,
Sharon A. Chang3,
Ernest S. Chang3,
Vered Chalifa-Caspi4,
Amir Berman4,5 and
Amir Sagi1,4,*
1 Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, PO Box
653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
2 Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, Tel-Shikmona, PO Box 8030,
Haifa 31080, Israel
3 Bodega Marine Laboratory, University of California-Davis, PO Box 247,
Bodega Bay, CA 94923, USA
4 National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University,
PO Box 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
5 Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Ben-Gurion University, PO Box
653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Changes in gastrolith size, ecdysteroids levels and development of setae
during an endocrinologically induced molt cycle in an XO–SG-extirpated
male C. quadricarinatus. (A) Digital X-ray imaging of gastrolith
growth during a representative endocrinologically induced molt cycle of
XO–SG-extirpated male. White arrows point to the gastroliths. Times of
endocrine induction and ecdysis are shown by gray arrows. (B) Changes in
gastrolith size (squares) determined by MMI (molt mineralization index:
gastrolith width as detected by X-ray imaging/carapace length), and
circulating ecdysteroids levels (pg µl–1; circles). The
x axis is normalized to days from ecdysis. (C) Diagram and light
microscope sections of the maxillar exopodite during intermolt (stage C,
broken square) and three stages of premolt (D0, D1 and
D2). Arrows indicate apolysis regions. Magnification x20.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Changes in gastrolith size during an induced molt cycle in a 20E-injected
male C. quadricarinatus. (A) Digital X-ray imaging of the gastrolith
in two representative specimens, one injected with 20E (bottom) and the other
with carrier (top), which served as control. Images were obtained in the
premolt stage on days –13, –6 and –4 relative to the
anticipated time of ecdysis; a round metal grid was used for size calibration
(10 mm diameter). (B) Upper graph shows the injection regime of 20E, (from a
stock solution: 1 µg µl–1 of a saline buffer containing
10% ethanol) injected twice a day; 1000 pg µl–1 was
calculated as the maximum physiological level. The injection regime and volume
of the carrier were identical in the control group and 20E-injected groups.
The x axis is normalized to days from ecdysis. Lower graph shows
changes in MMI during the induced molt cycle by repetitive injections of 20E.
The x axis is normalized to days from ecdysis. Squares, 20E-injected
animal; circles, carrier-injected control.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Relative quantification of the effect of 20E on CqVg expression
in vivo and in primary hepatocyte cell culture. (A) Intact and
XO–SG-extirpated crayfish were injected daily with either 20E or carrier
until they reached ecdysis. They were then sacrificed, and RNA was extracted
for evaluation of CqVg expression levels. The control intact crayfish
was not subjected to any injection. Different letters indicate statistical
significance (P<0.05). (B) A 24 h primary hepatocyte cell culture
from an intermolt male was subjected to four different concentrations of 20E:
1, 10, 100 and 1000 pg µl–1. In the carrier sample no 20E
was added. The positive control was a 24 h female primary hepatocytes cell
culture with no addition of 20E (Female). Different letters indicate
statistical significance (P<0.05).
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Assembly of the microarray chip and multigene expression patterns related
to elevation of ecdysteroids by two methods of endocrine molt induction. (A)
Schematic representation of the hybridization design of the experiment showing
each of the biological replicates. Arrowhead represents Cy3 labeling, and tail
represents Cy5 labeling. XO–SG, premolt crayfish induced by XO–SG
removal; 20E, premolt crayfish induced by repetitive 20E injections. The
different colors of the circles in each treatment group represent different
individuals, whereas in the reference group the same color represents pooling
of the samples. (B) Overview of all the clustered genes according to
treatments in the experiment. Red, treatment higher than reference; green,
reference higher than treatment; yellow, equal expression. Two representative
clusters of the ecdysteroid-responsive genes are indicated by boxes: the green
box marks the downregulated cluster and the red box the upregulated cluster.
(C) Expression scatter plots of all the genes represented on the chip in the
two treatments. M, log2-fold change of normalized emission
intensity between the treatment and the control; A, average signal in
all treatments; green line, the minimum threshold of A at 8.5; red
spots, genes with P<0.05, M value >1 or <–1,
and A value >8.5.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Gene expression patterns resulting from the two endocrine manipulations out
of all the sequenced and assembled genes from the chip, and the gene ontology
(GO) pie graph of the putative ecdysteroid-responsive genes. (A) Schematic
overview of the experiment showing the overlap between the two manipulations
(XO–SG and 20E), which forms the ecdysteroid-responsive group.
Upward-pointing arrows indicate upregulated genes; downward-pointing arrows
indicate downregulated genes; `unique sequences' are all the sequenced and
clustered genes from the chip. In cases where different clones (spots) from
the same gene belonged to different sections of the diagram, these genes were
counted multiple times. (B) Pie graph of GO of the putative
ecdysteroid-responsive genes. These genes showed a significant response during
premolt when ecdysteroid titers were elevated in both treatments.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. In vitro confirmation of the effects of 20E on
ecdysteroid-responsive genes. Real-time RT-PCR relative quantification of two
putative ecdysteroid-responsive genes, digestive cysteine proteinase
1 (A) and trypsin (B) in a 24 h hepatopancreatic tissue culture
subjected to four different concentrations of 20E (1, 10, 100 and 1000 pg
µl–1). Different letters indicate statistical significance
(P<0.05).
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007