spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 8, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 357-365 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02642
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Van Houten, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Van Houten, J. L.

Genetic dissection of attractant-induced conductances in Paramecium

Wade E. Bell1, Robin R. Preston2, Junji Yano3 and Judith L. Van Houten3,*

1 Department of Biology, 203 Science Building, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA 24450, USA
2 Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
3 Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Voltage-clamp recordings from cells in acetate or biotin. The cells were held at resting potential (-30 mV) using two-electrode voltage-clamp. (A) Solid bars indicate application of 1 mmol l-1 acetate. Lower two traces were recorded using K+-filled electrodes with 1 mmol l-1 K+ in the bath. K+ currents were suppressed in the middle and upper traces using CsCl and tetraethylammonium (TEA), leaving Ca2+ (1 mmol l-1) and Mg2+ (5 mmol l-1) as the predominant charge carriers. Arrows show the outward conductances upon addition of acetate and removal of acetate. (B) Solid bars indicate application of variable concentrations of biotin at variable pH. K+ currents were suppressed in the middle and upper traces using CsCl and TEA leaving Ca2+ (1 mmol l-1) and Mg2+ (5 mmol l-1) as the predominant charge carriers. Arrows show the inward conductances upon removal of biotin.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Behavior of cells entering and leaving acetate. Cells were analyzed using Motion Analysis as they entered 5 mmol l-1 acetate in buffer from a control buffer or vice versa. Cells were monitored for turns (% change in direction, PDC) and speed. (A) Cell turning upon entering acetate (On PDC); (B) cell turning upon leaving acetate (Off PDC); (C) speed in mm s-1 upon entering acetate (On speed). (A) Wild-type, Cam 11 and XntA On PDCs were significantly different from Controls. (B) Wild type and Cam 11 Off PDCs were significantly different from Controls. (C) Wild-type and Cam 11 speeds were significantly different from control (Mann-Whitney U-test, P<0.05). The wild-type and XntA cells were analyzed in Na-acetate; Cam 1-1 and Cam 11 were analyzed in K-acetate. (Values are means ± 1 s.e.m. of 45 or more measurements.)

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Cell behavior upon entering or leaving acetate. The data from Fig. 2 were transformed into differences between the control value and experimental value for on- and off-response PDCs (A) and on-response speed in mm s-1 (B). (C) The T-maze values for wild type and mutants in A and B. (Values >0.5 indicate attraction, <0.5 indicate repulsion.) Arrow indicates significant difference with wild type at P<0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Behavior of cells entering and leaving biotin solutions. Cells were analyzed using Motion Analysis as they entered 1 mmol l-1 biotin in buffer from a control buffer or vice versa. Cells were monitored for turns (% change in direction, PDC) and speed. (A) Cell turning upon entering biotin (On PDC); (B) the T-maze values for the wild type and mutants in biotin for comparison with A because the T-maze values correlate well with On-PDC responses; (C) Cell turning upon leaving biotin (Off PDC). (A) Cam 1-1 and wild type in Na-biotin On PDCs were significantly different from Controls (P<0.05). (B) All Values are means ± 1 s.e.m. of 45 or more measurements. Mann-Whitney U-test was used for statistical analysis of T-maze data; all values except for Cam 11 were different from wild type in Na+ and Mg2+ at P<0.05 level. (C) Wild type in Mg-biotin and Cam1-1 Off PDCs were significantly different from Controls. The wild type cells were analyzed in K-biotin pH 6.7, Na-biotin pH 7, Mg-biotin pH 7; Cam 1-1 in Na-biotin pH 7; Cam 11 K-biotin pH 6.7; XntA in Na-biotin pH 7 and Mg-biotin pH 7.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Cell behavior upon entering or leaving biotin solutions. The data from Fig. 4 were transformed into differences between the control value and experimental value for on- and off-response PDCs.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007