First published online January 8, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 261-268 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02631
Growing out of a caste - reproduction and the making of the queen mole-rat
Erin C. Henry1,
Christine M. Dengler-Crish2 and
Kenneth C. Catania1,*
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
37235, USA
2 Department of Neuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University,
Nashville, TN 37235, USA

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Radiographs of the naked mole-rats. (A) Relative sizes of mole-rats
examined in the study. All images are aligned at the base of the L8 vertebra
(broken line). The solid white line is aligned to the top of the lumbar spinal
column (anterior aspect of L1) in the breeding female (02-04). Only the
established breeding female has a comparably long lumbar spinal column. (B)
Diagram showing the width across the zygomatic arch (white line) and the
labeling scheme for the lumbar vertebra, with L4 marked with an asterisk. (C)
Two images of the same female mole-rat taken at the beginning and end of the
study. (D) An image of a late-stage pregnant mole-rat. Scale bar for all
panels=2 cm.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Lumbar vertebra growth over time. (A) Each dot on the graph represents the
length of the L4 vertebra at the time of radiography. The three breeders
(02-02, 02-04 and 02-05) show increased growth of L4 over time as compared
with nonbreeders and the breeding male. Starred dots indicate the L4
measurement just prior to parturition (parturition <7 days from recorded
radiograph). (B) An expanded view of pregnancy 5 for Breeder 02-04 (enlarged
version of the boxed area in A). Growth occurs throughout the 10-week
pregnancy, ending at parturition (starred dot).
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Lumbar vertebra lengthening exceeds non-specific body growth. (A) The ratio
of L4 length to zygomatic arch (ZA) width over time reveals that lumbar growth
is occurring at a higher rate than ZA growth (a marker for general growth) in
the new queens. Starred dots indicate births. (B) Bar graph plots the
percentage change in L4 length and ZA width over the course of the study. The
new queens (02-02, 02-04 and 02-05) all have greater increases in L4 length
compared with ZA width. The other mole-rats show minimal differences in the
percentage change of the two measurements.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Growth changes for each lumbar vertebra were normalized for general body
enlargement using the ratio of L#/ZA for the eight vertebra (#=1-8) and
(L1-L8)/ZA for the total lumbar spinal column, which includes intervertebral
spaces. The ratios were calculated using the beginning and ending vertebrae
and zygomatic arch (ZA) values to derive the percentage change over time. The
results are reported for the three breeding females (02-02, 02-04 and 02-05),
the nonbreeding female (02-13) and the breeding male (02-01).
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Pregnancy periods (P) have higher growth rates compared with nonpregnancy
periods (NP). (A-C) The mean growth rates for pregnancy and nonpregnancy
periods, plotted on an arbitrary 10-week time scale. (A) Breeder 02-02 mean
growth rates for pregnancy (N=6) and nonpregnancy (N=2)
periods. (B) Breeder 02-04 mean growth rates for pregnancy (N=7) and
nonpregnancy (N=2) periods. (C) Breeder 02-05 mean growth rates for
pregnancy (N=5) and nonpregnancy (N=3) periods. (D) The mean
L4 growth over time for the three breeders during pregnancy (black dots;
N=18) and non-pregnancy (gray dots; N=7) time periods. The
data from the three animals were standardized to baseline before they were
averaged. The raw data used to generate the means varied in number between
data points because some X-rays were excluded due to poor image quality
(criteria for exclusion included images where the bones were not in focus or
at an angle, which often happened if the mole-rat had moved or shifted during
the X-ray exposure). Further, some of the nonpregnancy periods were less than
10 weeks in length, which also affected the number of data points. The
N values for each data point used to generate this panel are listed
in Table 3. Regression lines
were fitted to both sets of data. Error bars in panels A-D represent ±
s.e.m.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007