spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 20, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2700-2705 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.002121
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palagi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dapporto, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palagi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dapporto, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Females do it better. Individual recognition experiments reveal sexual dimorphism in Lemur catta (Linnaeus 1758) olfactory motivation and territorial defence

Elisabetta Palagi1,* and Leonardo Dapporto2

1 Centro Interdipartimentale Museo di Storia Naturale e del Territorio, Università di Pisa, Via Roma 79, 56011, Calci, Pisa, Italy
2 Istituto Comprensivo Materna Elementare Media Convenevole da Prato via 1° Maggio 40, 59100, Prato, Italy


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Canonical discriminant functions. Discriminant Analysis of 28 samples of genital secretions from five Lemur catta females on the basis of the proportions of the peaks identified using GC/FID. The percentages of the variance explained by each of the two main functions are given in parentheses. The arrow indicates the only sample incorrectly assigned to its own subject on the basis of the two first functions.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Olfactory investigation performed by males and females on (A,B) group-mate (open bars) and unfamiliar (filled bars) odours (Experiment 3a) and on (C,D) familiar-competitor (open bars) and unfamiliar (filled bars) odours (Experiment 3b).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Scheme summarizing the procedure to design functional experiments and indicating the possible interpretations of the results.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007