spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 20, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2667-2675 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.005751
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stickland, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stickland, N. C.

In ovo temperature manipulation influences embryonic motility and growth of limb tissues in the chick (Gallus gallus)

Christina L. Hammond*, Biggy H. Simbi and Neil C. Stickland

Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London, NW1 0TU, UK


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Schematic to show the incubation temperature regime and tissue collection schedule of experiments

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Mean number of embryonic movements, not including amnion contractions, per embryo in a 5 min period. **P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Sample sizes: ED5, N=10; ED6, N=22; ED7, N=18; ED11, N=14.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Total embryo wet mass of chicks sampled between ED9 and ED18. **P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Sample sizes: ED9, N=14; ED11, N=14; ED12, N=15; ED15, N=32; ED18, N=24.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. (A) Mean combined length of the tarsus and tibia in chicks between ED11 and ED18. **P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Sample sizes: ED11, N=14; ED12, N=16; ED15, N=32; ED18, N=24. (B) Mean femur length between ED12 and ED18. Sample sizes: ED12, N=16; ED15, N=28; ED18, N=22. **P<0.05, ***P<0.001. (C,D) Alcian Blue/Alizarin Red-stained chick hind limbs; red staining shows mineralized bone, while blue staining shows the unmineralized cartilage. (C) Representative hind limbs at ED12; the top limb comes from a chick raised at 38.5°C while the lower limb comes from a control chick. (D) Representative hind limbs at ED15; the limb on the left comes from a chick raised at 38.5°C, with a control limb on the right. Scale bar in C and D represents 5 mm. Sample sizes were ED12, N=12; ED15, N=22. (E,F) Images taken from Micro-CT scans of ED15 femurs. (E) ED15 femur of a chick raised at 37.5°C; left image shows the whole bone while the three right images show, top to bottom, individual scans at 25%, 50% and 75% length of the mineralized portion of the bone (as calculated by the programme); the white portion in the cross-sectional scan represents mineralized bone. (F) As E but for a chick raised on the experimental temperature regime.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. (A) Mean number of myofibres and myonuclei per 150 000 µm2 of cross-sectional area of the gastrocnemius muscle at ED18 (N=14). (B) Mean mass of the gastrocnemius at ED18 (N=14). (C) Mean ratio of myonuclei:myofibre in the gastrocnemius at ED18 (N=14). In A–C, **P<0.05, ***P<0.001. (D,E) Representative haematoxylin- and eosin-stained cross sections through the gastrocnemius of ED18 chicks raised at 37.5°C (D) and 38.5°C (E). Scale bars, 50 µm. (F,G) Representative Decorin antibody stained cross sections, through the gastrocnemius at ED18 of chicks raised at 37.5°C (F) and 38.5°C (G).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. (A) Mean adipocyte cell cross-sectional area in chicks at ED15 (N=10) and ED18 (N=12). (B) Mean cross-sectional area of the pectoral fat pad at ED18 (N=12). ***P<0.001. (C,D) Haematoxylin- and eosin-stained cross-sections through the pectoral fat pads of ED15 chicks raised at 37.5°C (C) and 38.5°C (D). Scale bars, 50 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007