spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 29, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2419-2429 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.002568
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hung, C. Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hung, C. Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, P. A.

Rhesus glycoprotein gene expression in the mangrove killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus exposed to elevated environmental ammonia levels and air

C. Y. C. Hung1,2, K. N. T. Tsui2, J. M. Wilson3, C. M. Nawata2, C. M. Wood2 and P. A. Wright1,*

1 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
2 Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
3 Ecofisiologia CIMAR Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123, Porto, Portugal


Figure 1
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
 

Figure 2
View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Amino acid sequence alignment of Kryptolebias marmoratus Rh with other Rh sequences. Conserved amino acids are shaded in black and similar amino acids are shaded in grey. Potential N-glycosylation sites of K. marmoratus RhCGs are underlined in red. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of Kryptolebias marmoratus RhBG with other RhBG sequences. Accession numbers of sequences: Takifugu rubripes AAM48577; Danio rerio AAQ09527; Homo sapiens NP_065140; Rattus norvegicus AAH79365 and Mus musculus NP_067350. (B) Amino acid sequence alignment of K. marmoratus RhCGs with other RhCG sequences. Accession numbers of sequences: Takifugu rubripes RhCG1 AAM48578; Takifugu rubripes RhCG2 AAM48579; Danio rerio AAM90586; Homo sapiens AAH30965; Rattus norvegicus NP_898876 and Mus musculus NP_062773.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Protein characteristics of K. marmoratus RhBG, RhCG1 and RhCG2. Amino acid compositions indicate that all three Rh proteins consist of hydrophobic and polar amino acids, and all three proteins are negatively charged at physiological pH. Hydropathy profiles (Kyte–Doolittle scale) indicate that high hydrophobicity regions are dispersed along all three sequences and these high hydrophobicity regions correspond to the predicted transmembrane domains (red blocks). All three Rh proteins have intracellular N- and C-terminals.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of K. marmoratus RhBG and RhCGs and other homologues. Two major clusters are identified: Cluster I (RhCG), Cluster II (RhBG). Cluster I is subdivided into Ia (fish/amphibian/mammals/aves) and Ib (invertebrates). Cluster II is also further divided into IIa (fish) and IIb (mammals/amphibian/aves). Sequences are obtained from GenBank with accession numbers indicated.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Whole-body ammonia content of K. marmoratus after 5 days of 0 mmol l–1, 1 mmol l–1 and 2 mmol l–1 ammonia exposure. Asterisk indicates that tissue ammonia was significantly higher at 2 mmol l–1 ammonia compared to 0 mmol l–1 and 1 mmol l–1 ammonia. Values are means ± s.e.m., N=6 (one-way ANOVA, P<0.05).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. RT-PCR mRNA expression of RhBG, RhCG1 and RhCG2 in control (0 mmol l–1 ammonia) and ammonia-exposed (2 mmol l–1 ammonia) K. marmaratus. For each gene, the following tissues are shown from left to right: brain, eye, gill, gonad, gut, kidney, liver, skeletal muscle and skin. Each gel represents one individual (control N=3, ammonia-exposed N=3). Note RhBG, RhCG1 and RhCG2 are expressed strongly in gill tissue. RhBG expression is low in control tissues except in gill and skin, but higher in many tissues in ammonia-exposed fish. RhCG1 expression in skin is induced with ammonia exposure and RhCG2 expression remains restricted to gill tissues.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Relative mRNA expression levels of gill Rh genes in excretory organs (gills and skin) of K. marmaratus exposed to 0 mmol l–1 (control) or 1 and 2 mmol l–1 NH4HCO3. (A) Gill RhBG, RhCG1 and RhCG2 relative to 18S rRNA. Asterisk indicates that RhCG2 mRNA levels were significantly higher than in fish exposed to 2 mmol l–1 ammonia compared to 0 or 1 mmol l–1 ammonia. RhBG and RhCG1 were not significantly different between control and ammonia-exposed fish. Values are means ± s.e.m.; 0 and 2 mmol l–1 ammonia, N=7, 1 mmol l–1 ammonia, N=8; one-way ANOVA, P<0.05). (B) Skin RhBG, RhCG1 and RhCG2 relative to EF1a. Letters (a,b,c) indicate that RhCG1 mRNA levels were significantly higher in fish exposed to 1 mmol l–1 relative to 0 mmol l–1 ammonia, and significantly higher in 2 mmol l–1 relative to 0 and 1 mmol l–1 ammonia. Asterisk indicates that RhCG2 was significantly higher in 1 mmol l–1 compared to 0 and 2 mmol l–1 ammonia. RhBG was not significantly different between control and ammonia-exposed fish. Values are means ± s.e.m.; N=6 (one-way ANOVA, P<0.05).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Relative mRNA expression levels of RhBG to EF1a in internal organs of K. marmaratus exposed to 0 mmol l–1 (control) or 1 and 2 mmol l–1 NH4HCO3. In brain, no significant difference was observed between control and ammonia-exposed fish. In liver, RhBG was significantly higher in liver of fish exposed to 2 mmol l–1 (b) compared to 0 mmol l–1 (a), but there was no significant difference between 0 (a) and 1 mmol l–1 ammonia (a,b), as well as between 1 and 2 mmol l–1 ammonia-exposed fish. In muscle, RhBG in muscle was significantly higher in fish exposed to 2 mmol l–1 (asterisk) than 0 and 1 mmol l–1 ammonia. Values are means ± s.e.m.; N=6 (one-way ANOVA, P<0.05).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Relative mRNA expression levels of RhBG, RhCG1 and RhCG2 to EF1a in the skin of control (immersed) or air-exposed K. marmoratus. Asterisks indicate both RhCG1 and RhCG2 were significantly higher in skin of air-exposed relative to control fish. Values are means ± s.e.m.; N=6; air-exposed: N=4 (t-test, P<0.05).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007