spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 15, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2346-2351 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.002857
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Díaz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Planas, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Díaz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Planas, J. V.

Physiological regulation of glucose transporter (GLUT4) protein content in brown trout (Salmo trutta) skeletal muscle

Mònica Díaz, Encarnación Capilla* and Josep V. Planas{dagger}

Departament de Fisiologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Total protein content of btGLUT4 in red and white muscle from brown trout. (A) Immunodetection of btGLUT4 and actin protein in total membrane preparations from red and white muscle. 25 µg of protein was loaded in each lane, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using antibodies against okGLUT4 and chicken actin. (B) Densitometric analysis of the btGLUT4/actin ratios from red muscle and white muscle. Values are means ± s.e.m. and are referred to red muscle, which was set to 1 (N=6). *Significant differences compared with red muscle (P<0.01).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effects of fasting (45 days) on the btGLUT4 protein content of red muscle and white muscle from brown trout. (A) Immunodetection of btGLUT4 and actin protein in total membrane preparations from red and white muscle. 25 µg of protein was loaded in each lane, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using antibodies against okGLUT4 and chicken actin. (B) Densitometric analysis of the btGLUT4/actin ratios from red muscle and white muscle. Values are means ± s.e.m. and are referred to the fed group (control), which was set to 1 (N=4-5). *Significant differences compared with the control group for each type of muscle (P<0.01).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Effects of insulin treatment (24 h) on the btGLUT4 protein content of red muscle and white muscle from brown trout. (A) Immunodetection of btGLUT4 and actin protein in total membrane preparations from red and white muscle. 25 µg of protein was loaded in each lane, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using antibodies against okGLUT4 and chicken actin. (B) Densitometric analysis of the btGLUT4/actin ratios from red muscle and white muscle. Values are means ± s.e.m. and are referred to the saline-injected group, which was set to 1 (N=5-6). *Significant differences compared with the saline-injected group for each type of muscle (P<0.05).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effects of arginine treatment (24 h) on the btGLUT4 protein content of red muscle and white muscle from brown trout. (A) Immunodetection of btGLUT4 and actin protein in total membrane preparations from red and white muscle. 25 µg of protein was loaded in each lane, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using antibodies against okGLUT4 and chicken actin. A representative western blot is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of the btGLUT4/actin ratios from red muscle and white muscle. Values are means ± s.e.m. and are referred to the saline-injected group, which was set to 1 (N=10).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007