spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 21, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2000-2005 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02780
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nespolo, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Franco, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nespolo, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Franco, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Whole-animal metabolic rate is a repeatable trait: a meta-analysis

Roberto F. Nespolo1,* and Marcela Franco2

1 Instituto de Ecología y Evolución, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile
2 Instituto de Zoología, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Frequency histogram of published repeatabilities reviewed in this study (see Table 1 for details).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Funnel plot showing the relationship between effect size and sample size. For resolution purposes, two cases with N=242 (Garland and Bennett, 1990Go), which did not change the regression results, were excluded from the graph.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Cumulative effect sizes in repeatability estimations (see Table 1). Error bars represent 95% confident intervals.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007