spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 8, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1834-1845 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.001495
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fonseca, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Correia, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fonseca, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Correia, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of temperature on tuning of the auditory pathway in the cicada Tettigetta josei (Hemiptera, Tibicinidae)

P. J. Fonseca* and T. Correia

Departamento de Biologia Animal e Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Set-up used to control the body temperature of the cicada during intracellular recordings of auditory interneurons and recordings of the auditory nerve activity. The temperature of the animal holder was modified with a Peltier element and controlled via two thermocouples. The sensor in the holder kept its temperature within values compatible with the living tissues (10–40°C) while the second thermocouple measured and was used to control the temperature of the cicada body. The flowing water is needed to add to or remove heat from the Peltier element.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Examples of electrophysiological responses of the auditory interneurons. The types varied from a phasic response (A) with a single action potential, to a phasic-tonic (B) and a more tonic response (C). The examples are from three cells recorded 20 dB above threshold at 6 kHz and at 24°C.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Examples of four morphological types of auditory interneurons (see Table 1) (tj19-1, tj67-1, tj67-2, tj71-2) with two sensitivity maxima that revealed a shift in the characteristic frequency in the range 3–8 kHz. A fifth cell type (tj52-1) with a different morphology was only partially stained and therefore is not shown. The cells were stained with Lucifer Yellow.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effects of body temperature on tuning, sensitivity, latency and response strength of auditory interneurons of the cicada T. josei. (A,B) Tuning curves of two interneurons exhibiting shifts in their tuning and sensitivity with body temperatures ranging from 16°C to 28°C. Maximum effects are observed at temperatures from 16–18°C to 24°C in the frequency range 3 to 8 kHz. At higher frequencies the characteristic frequency remains constant, but some effect on sensitivity is still present. (C) Sensitivity at the characteristic frequency of 20 recordings, of the 29 cells listed in Table 1, which exhibited an increased sensitivity with temperature. The lines connect the sensitivities of each interneuron. (D) Dependence of latency on temperature, obtained from 29 recordings of interneurons. Latencies were measured 20 dB above threshold at the characteristic frequency and decreased with increasing temperature. (E) Dependence of the number of action potentials on the temperature in 29 recordings. At each temperature the number of action potentials is an average of five stimulus presentations at the characteristic frequency and 20 dB above threshold.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Intracellular recording of an auditory interneuron showing the variation in latency and strength of the response with temperature. The sound stimulus at 6 kHz was delivered 20 dB above threshold at each temperature.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Effects of body temperature on tuning, sensitivity and latency evaluated from recordings of the auditory nerve of the cicada T. josei. (A) Averaged and (B) example tuning curves measured at different temperatures ranging from 16°C to 28°C. There is a strong effect in the characteristic frequency and sensitivity in the range 3–8 kHz, but not at higher frequencies. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. (C) Sensitivity at the characteristic frequency measured in the 10 cicadas, from 19 recordings (see Table 2), which exhibited increased sensitivity with temperature. The lines connect the sensitivities evaluated from each auditory nerve recording. (D) Dependence of latency on temperature measured in 19 cicadas. Latencies were measured 20 dB above threshold and decreased with increasing temperature.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. The typical effect of body temperature, in one of three males measured, on the vibrations of the tympanal apodeme measured by laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV). There is no clear effect on the vibration velocity (presented in arbitrary units) and the phase angle, especially in the frequency range 3–8 kHz, where a strong effect of body temperature on auditory tuning and sensitivity was measured in the nervous system. The diagram on the right is of a the tympanum, tympanal apodeme and auditory organ, indicating the point where the laser beam was focused.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Effects of 200 mmol l–1 tetraethylammonium (TEA) on tuning and sensitivity evaluated from recordings of the auditory nerve of the cicada T. josei. (A) Averaged and (B) example tuning curves measured before and after drug application, and the effect of repeatedly washing with insect saline. TEA resulted in a downward shift of the characteristic frequency and a reduced sensitivity. Sensitivity and tuning were reestablished after repeatedly washing the preparation with insect saline for up to 2 h 30 min. Error bars in A indicate the standard deviation. Recordings were made at ambient temperature of 24–28°C.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007