spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 2, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1044-1051 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02125
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yerushalmi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bloch, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yerushalmi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bloch, G.

Developmentally determined attenuation in circadian rhythms links chronobiology to social organization in bees

Shai Yerushalmi, Shalev Bodenhaimer and Guy Bloch*

Department of Evolution, Systematics, and Ecology, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Size and division of labor in B. terrestris. (A) The relationship between body size (forewing length) and the propensity to forage. Each filled circle represents a single bee observed in Session A of Colony 2. The broken line depicts the regression of foraging propensity on wing length (y=0.16x–1.18, R2=0.46). Similar results were obtained in Session B for this colony and in both sessions for Colony 3 (size was not recorded in Colony 1). (B) Age-related plasticity in worker task. Individually marked workers were observed for two sessions of 4 successive days each. The two sessions (A and B) were separated by a period of 3–4 days. The figure depicts the percentage of foragers (filled bars), intermediate (hatched bars), and nurses (open bars) in session B as a function of their task in session A. Data were pooled from the three colonies. Numbers within bars indicate sample size. (C) Body size and age at first pollen foraging. Foraging trips (a bee returning to the hive with pollen) of individually marked bees were recorded using an automatic video system equipped with motion detection technology. Large bees (marginal cell ≥2.75 mm; dotted line, N=59) began to forage at a younger age than small bees (marginal cell <2.75 mm; continuous line, N=34; Kaplan–Meier Survival Analysis with Breslow statistics, P=0.007).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Division of labor and activity rhythms in free flying B. terrestris colonies. (A) Representative actogram for a forager. The numbers on the y-axis depict the day of observation. The height of the bars within each day corresponds to the number of scans in which the bee was active (see Materials and methods for details). Data for each day are double plotted to facilitate visual detection of rhythmicity. This individual has significant diurnal rhythms in activity. The bar at the bottom of the plot depicts the illumination regime. Open bar=day (sunrise to sunset); filled bar=night (sunset to sunrise). (B) Representative actogram for a nurse. Details of plot as in A. Hatched part of the illumination regime bar depicts the time of day for a bee that stays inside the constantly dark hive. This individual has no diurnal rhythms in activity. (C) Representative summary of the percentage of rhythmic nurses and foragers (Colony 2, session B). A higher proportion of foragers have significant circadian rhythms (Fisher's Exact Test, P<0.001; similar results were obtained for two additional colonies in session B and for colony 2 in session A). (D) Development of diurnal rhythms in young foragers and intermediates in free-flying colonies (pooled data from all three colonies). The proportion of bees with circadian rhythms was higher in session B (Fisher Exact Test, N=13, P<0.05). There was no similar development of rhythm in nurses. (E) Representative summary for the relationship between body size and the power of circadian rhythms (Colony 2, session A, R2=0.34, N=15, P<0.05). Similar results were obtained for an additional colony. Note that in this experiment foragers experienced day–night oscillations whereas nurses typically stayed inside the relatively constant environment of the hive.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Body size and circadian rhythms in locomotor activity for B. terrestris workers in a constant laboratory environment. Individual workers were monitored from the day they emerged from the pupa. (A) Representative actogram for an individual small bee. The height of the small bars within each day corresponds to the locomotor activity in a 5 min bin. Other details of the actogram are as in Fig. 2A. This individual emerged from the pupa at day 4, and had significant circadian rhythms at 6 days of age (power=273, determined after 6 days of age). There was an alternation in FRP at 13 days of age. (B) Representative actogram for an individual large bee. Details of actogram as in A. This individual is from the same trial as the one in A, emerged from the pupa at day 3, and had significant circadian rhythms for the first time at 3 days of age (power=505). (C) The relationship between body size and the strength of circadian rhythms. The broken line represents the regression for the power of circadian rhythms on the length of the forewing marginal cell (an index for body size; regression analysis; N=41, R2=0.2, P<0.005; y=264x–447). (D) The power of circadian rhythms in small and large bees. Numbers within bars indicate sample size. The differences are statistically significant (unpaired t-test, P=0.0015). (E) Age at onset of circadian rhythms for large (broken line, N=17) and small (continuous line, N=25) workers. The differences between small and large bees were statistically significant (Kaplan–Meier Survival Analysis, Breslow statistic, P<0.025).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Body size and circadian rhythms in locomotor activity for B. terrestris workers in an oscillating (LD) laboratory environment. (A) Actogram for a small bee. Details of the actogram as in Fig. 3A. The background of the plot delineates illumination regime: white background, light phase; gray background, dark phase. This individual emerged from the pupa at day 1, had a nocturnal activity pattern for the first 8 days, and then switched to a diurnal activity pattern. Anticipation of light on is evident at 12 days of age (black arrow). (B) Development of diurnal rhythms for large (top) and small (bottom) workers. Filled bars, significant rhythms with peak activity during the dark phase; open bars, peak activity during the light phase. Asterisks and plus signs indicate days in which there were significant differences in the proportion of small and large bees that were active during the light or dark phase, respectively (Fisher's 2x2 Exact Test, P<0.05). (C) Anticipation of light transition in small (continuous line, N=14) and large (dotted line, N=33) workers. Included are bees with nocturnal activity that anticipated light-off and bees with diurnal activity that anticipated light-on (Survival Analysis, P>0.05).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006