spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 15, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 945-955 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02102
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shillito, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gaill, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shillito, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gaill, F.

Temperature resistance studies on the deep-sea vent shrimp Mirocaris fortunata

Bruce Shillito1,*, Nadine Le Bris2, Stéphane Hourdez3, Juliette Ravaux1, Delphine Cottin1, Jean-Claude Caprais2, Didier Jollivet3 and Françoise Gaill1

1 UMR CNRS 7138 `Systématique, Adaptation et Evolution', Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 Quai St-Bernard, Batiment A, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
2 Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Centre de Brest, DRO-EP, BP70, 29280 Plouzané, France
3 Station Marine de Roscoff, UPR CNRS 9042, BP74, 29682 Roscoff Cedex, France


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Rate of oxygen consumption (µg O2 h–1) as a function of dry mass (mg), of Mirocaris fortunata individuals originating from the Lucky Strike vent site (1700 m depth), at 10°C. Open circles, solid line: atmospheric pressure experiment (exp. 0, 12 individuals). Closed circles, broken line: in situ pressure experiment (exp. 4, 17 MPa, 10 individuals). For correlation coefficients and P values, see text.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mortality (% of the initial pool) of Mirocaris fortunata individuals originating from the Rainbow site (2300 m depth) as a function of time, during maintenance at atmospheric pressure, at three different temperatures: 10°C, 16°C and 21°C (73, 68, 67 individuals, respectively).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Mortality (% of initial pool) of Mirocaris fortunata individuals originating from the Menez Gwen site (850 m depth) as a function of time, during maintenance at atmospheric pressure, at four different temperatures: 10°C, 16°C, 21°C and 25°C (48 individuals at each of the first three temperatures; 16 individuals for the 25°C experiment).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Distribution of behavioural categories throughout a lethal heat shock applied to Lucky Strike M. fortunata shrimps (20 individuals), at in situ pressure (17 MPa, exp. 6). Squares, total movement, i.e. C2+C3=20–C1; circles, moving more than body length, i.e. C3; triangles, loss of equilibrium, i.e. C4; solid bold line, temperature (°C). For an explanation of the behavioural categories, see Table 1.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Distribution of behavioural categories throughout a lethal heat shock applied to Menez Gwen M. fortunata shrimps (20 individuals), at in situ pressure (8.5 MPa, exp. 7). Squares, total movement, i.e. C2+C3=20–C1; circles, moving more than body length, i.e. C3; triangles, loss of equilibrium, i.e. C4; solid bold line: temperature (°C). For an explanation of the behavioural categories, see Table 1.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Data for loss of equilibrium (i.e. C4; see Table 1) for Mirocaris fortunata (open triangles, filled triangles, from Figs 4 and 5, respectively) are compared to those for Rimicaris exoculata (solid diamonds, broken line), another vent shrimp studied previously (Ravaux et al., 2003Go). The latter data are the result of experiments using 15 individuals, which are here multiplied by 1.33 (20/15) to allow comparison with experiments (20 individuals).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006