spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 1, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 4557-4565 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02535
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuntz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, W.

Seasonal adjustment of energy budget in a large wild mammal, the Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) I. Energy intake

Regina Kuntz, Christina Kubalek, Thomas Ruf, Frieda Tataruch and Walter Arnold*

Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Savoyenstraße 1, 1160 Vienna, Austria


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Seasonal changes of nutrients in dry matter intake (percentage of dry matter intake; values are means ± s.e.m., missing error bars represent s.e.m. smaller than symbol size). Filled symbols represent data from the first year of dry matter intake measurements (July 2002-May 2003), open symbols represent data from the second year (July 2003-January 2004).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (5K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Seasonal variation of dry matter intake (values are means ± s.e.m.). Filled symbols represent data from the first year of study (July 2002-May 2003), open symbols represent data from the second year (July 2003-January 2004). Line: periodic fit to residual variation of dry matter intake adjusted for the influence of nutrients (for statistics, see Table 2).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Variation of dry matter intake (filled symbols, solid line, values are means ± s.e.m.) and average time spent feeding per day (open symbols, broken line, values are means ± s.e.m.). Data for both parameters were simultaneously collected from three to four Przewalski horses during five experiments.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (5K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Seasonal changes in the time period between administration of the first marker and occurrence of peak concentration of the marker in faeces (values are means ± s.e.m.). Filled symbols represent data from the first year of study (July 2002-May 2003), open symbols represent data from the second year (July 2003-January 2004). Line: periodic fit.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Concentrations of crude protein (A) and crude fibre (B) in dry matter intake and in faecal material. Different symbols indicate different months of measurement (circle: January; hexagon: March; triangle: May; square: July; inverted triangle: September; diamond: November). Filled symbols represent data from the first year of study (July 2002-May 2003), open symbols represent data from the second year (July 2003-January 2004).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (5K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Seasonal variation of visually assessed index of body condition (values are means ± s.e.m., missing error bars represent sample sizes too small to calculate s.e.m.; line, periodic fit).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006