spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 4304-4312 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02521
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, S.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, S.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.-H.

Influence of ultraviolet radiation on selected physiological responses of earthworms

Shu-Chun Chuang1, Wei-Shan Lai1 and Jiun-Hong Chen1,2,*

1 Institute of Zoology, National Taiwan University, No. 1 Roosevelt Road, Section 4, Taipei 106, Taiwan
2 Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, No. 1 Roosevelt Road, Section 4, Taipei 106, Taiwan


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. S-shaped movements of Amynthas gracilis exposed to UV-A or UV-B. (A) UV-A exposure. As the dose of UV-A increases, the frequency of the S-shaped movements increases. (B) With UV-B exposure, the same phenomenon is seen.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (6K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Jumping behavior of Amynthas gracilis exposed to UV-A or UV-B expressed as the percentage of individuals showing this behavior. When the earthworms were exposed to less than 1000 J m-2 of either UV-A or UV-B, no individuals jumped. But after exposure to higher doses, abnormal jumping behavior appeared. As the dosages increased, the cumulative percentage of jump individuals was significant increased ({chi}2 test, N=30, P<0.001).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relative crawling time of earthworms after exposure to either UV-A. The crawling time of P. corethrurus and A. gracilis exposed to 1500 J m-2 of UV-A was significantly increased compared to controls (two-way ANOVA, N=6, *P<0.01), but that of M. posthuma shows no significant difference.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relative crawling time of earthworms after exposure to either UV-B. After UV-B exposure, P. corethrurus and M. posthuma show a significantly increased crawling time compared to controls (two-way ANOVA, N=6, *P<0.01), but A. gracilis does not.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Oxygen consumption of Amynthas gracilis and Metaphire posthuma after UV exposure. (A) After UV-A exposure (1500 J m-2), the oxygen consumption of A. gracilis is lower than that of controls (NEST design, N=6, P<0.01), but that of M. posthuma is not affected. (B) After UV-B exposure (1500 J m-2), the oxygen consumption of A. gracilis is lower than in controls (NEST design, N=6, P<0.01), but that of M. posthuma is not affected.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mortality of earthworms after UV-B exposure. (A) M. posthuma shows significant mortality after exposure to UV-B (1000 or 1500 J m-2; two-way ANOVA, N=20, P<0.01), the effect being dose-dependent. (B) A. gracilis only shows significant mortality after exposure to UV-B (1500 J m-2; two-way ANOVA, N=20, P<0.01). In addition, the survival time of A. gracilis was shorter than that of M. posthuma after UV-B exposure (ANOVA, P<0.01).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (106K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Tissue structure of A. gracilis before and after exposure to 1500 J m-2 of UV-B. (A) Cross-section of A. gracilis without UV-B exposure, clearly showing the cuticle (C) and epidermis (E). (B) Section of A. gracilis immediately after exposure to UV-B. The cuticle swelled and the epidermis necrosed. (C) After 2 h exposure, the cuticle shows breakdown, and the epidermis, circular muscle (CM) and longitudinal muscle (L) show necrosis. (D) After 18 h exposure, the epidermis and circular muscle are destroyed and only the longitudinal muscle is present. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Tissue structure of M. posthuma before and after exposure to 1500 J m-2 of UV-B. (A) Cross-section of M. posthuma without UV-B exposure, showing the cuticle (C) and epidermis (E). (B) Right after UV-B exposure, no obvious damage was seen in the cuticle or epidermis. (C) After 36 h exposure to UV-B, the cuticle and epidermis are pleated, and some epidermal cells show necrosis. (D) After 48 h exposure, the epidermis is destroyed and some circular muscle (CM) is deformed (arrow). L, longitudinal muscle. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006