First published online January 3, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 380-390 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01988
Iridescent plumage in satin bowerbirds: structure, mechanisms and nanostructural predictors of individual variation in colour
Stéphanie M. Doucet1,*,
Matthew D. Shawkey1,
,
Geoffrey E. Hill1 and
Robert Montgomerie2
1 Department of Biological Sciences, 331Funchess Hall, Auburn University,
Auburn, AL 36849, USA
2 Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada K7L
3N6

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the four different thin-film models
investigated in this study. Curved arrows represent beams of light. The models
represent all possible combinations of layers and interfaces for the upper
surface of the iridescent barbules of adult male satin bowerbirds.
|
|

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Comparison of the feathers of adult (A,C,E,G) and juvenile (B,D,F,H) male
satin bowerbirds. (A,B) Photographs of feathers; (C,D) scanning electron
micrographs of barbs and barbules; (EH) transmission electron
micrographs of barbule cross-sections. In transmission electron micrographs,
the dark ovals are melanin granules and the grey areas are keratin. Scale
bars, 200 µm (C,D), 5 µm (E,F), 800 nm (G,H). Note that the scanning
electron micrograph shown in C was taken at the proximal end of feather barbs
to allow visualization of the twisting and flattening of barbules. The distal
ends of feather barbs are much more densely covered with barbules.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Comparison of adult male satin bowerbird reflectance spectra, either
measured using a spectrometer (solid lines) or predicted from thin-film
optical models (broken and dotted lines). Predicted spectra are modeled based
on measurements of barbule nanostructure from the individual whose measured
spectrum is shown. Model 2 (dotted line) closely predicted measured spectra
(solid line). By contrast, Models 1 (dashes and dots), 3 (short dashes), and 4
(long dashes) were poor predictors of measured spectra.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Graphical representation of the effect of changing various parameters on
the predictive ability of thin-film Model 2. (A,B) The solid line shows Model
2 calculated from the variables as described in the text (extinction
coefficient k of keratin=0.03, melanin=0.6; refractive index
n of keratin=1.56, melanin=2.0). (A) The effects of increasing
k of keratin to 0.06 (dotted line) and melanin to 1.0 (broken line).
(B) The effects of increasing n of melanin to 2.2 (dotted line) and
decreasing n of melanin to 1.8 (broken line).
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Reflectance of adult male satin bowerbird barbules predicted by Model 2.
The dotted line separates bird-visible wavelengths (300700 nm) from
near-infrared wavelengths (7001400 nm). The bird-visible reflectance
peak is a second-order harmonic of the fundamental peak in the
near-infrared.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Relation between cortex thickness and hues predicted from thin-film optical
theory using Model 2 (broken line) and hues measured with a reflectance
spectrometer (solid circles) for the iridescent rump feathers of adult male
satin bowerbirds.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Changes in brightness (diamonds) and saturation (circles) of adult male
bowerbird feathers measured at different angles of incidence.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. Relationship between hues predicted from thin-film optical theory (Model 2)
and hues measured with a reflectance spectrometer for the iridescent rump
feathers of adult male satin bowerbirds measured at six different angles of
incidence (angles shown above symbols).
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006