spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online September 19, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3887-3897 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02446
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norberg, U. M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norberg, U. M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, Y.

Wing beat kinematics of a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, flying at different flight speeds and Strouhal numbers

Ulla M. Lindhe Norberg1,* and York Winter2

1 Department of Zoology, Göteborg University, Box 463, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
2 Department of Biology, Bielefield University, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Lateral projection of the wing movements relative to the ground of Glossophaga soricina flying from right to left at slow flight speeds, 2.4-3.5 m s-1. The top flight shows the tracks of the wingtip of the bat and the other two flights also include the tracks of the thumb. In slow flight (top flight) the wings are moved backwards relative to the ground during the upstroke. As speed increases the wingtip path becomes more vertical. Wing beat frequency (wb s-1) decreases with increasing flight speed. The times indicated to the left, 0.0055-0.0072 s, are the times between each dot (numbered on the traces). Scale bars, 5 cm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Lateral projection of the wing movements relative to the ground of Glossophaga soricina flying from right to left at flight speeds of 4.6-7.5 m s-1. The wingtip paths become more sinusoidal relative to the ground as speed increases. Scale bars, 5 cm. For further explanation, see Fig. 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Ventral projection of the wing-tip movements of Glossophaga soricina flying at 1.7 m s-1. It can be seen that the backward flick of the wingtips is pronounced. The photographs show a hovering bat from below (left) and from the side (right) twisting the wings in the upstroke as in slow flight. T, top position; MD, middle position; B, bottom position of the wings, where the numbers refer to the numbers on the track. The time between each dot (numbered) is 0.0082 s for the two last (left) strokes. Scale bar, 5 cm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Ventral projection of the wing movements of Glossophaga soricina flying at 3.15 m s-1. The backward flick of the wingtips is still visible. T, top position; MD, middle position; B, bottom position of the wings. The time between each dot (numbered) is 0.005 s. Scale bar, 5 cm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Ventral projection of the wing movements of Glossophaga soricina flying at 3.9 m s-1. There is no backward motion of the wingtips relative to the ground. T, top position; MD, middle position; B, bottom position of the wings. The time between each dot (numbered) is 0.0083 s. Scale bar, 5 cm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Lateral projection of the tracks of the wingtip, thumb (at 2.3 and 3.1 m s-1), and tail tip (at 2.3, 3.5 and 4.0 m s-1) relative to the shoulder joint of Glossophaga soricina flying at different flight speeds. The stroke plane angle increases and wing beat frequency decreases with increasing flight speed. The up and down movements of the tail (uropatagium) are most pronounced at the slowest speeds.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Wing beat frequency plotted on logarithmic coordinates against flight speed in the pregnant specimen of Glossophaga soricina, flying at speeds 1.75-4.78 m s-1 (continuous line) and at speeds 1.75-3.99 m s-1 (broken line).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Strouhal number as a function of flight speed in Glossophaga soricina. At speeds close to the theoretical minimum power speed (4-6 ms-1) G. soricina operates with a Strouhal number associated with efficient lift and thrust production, 0.17<St<0.22. In the range 3.4-4 ms-1 the Strouhal number is 0.25-0.4, which still is in a favourable region, but when V<3 ms-1 the Strouhal number becomes higher (0.5<St<0.68), indicating that unsteady effects are important and that the production of lift and thrust is unfavourable.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Strouhal number plotted on logarithmic coordinates against flight speed in Glossophaga soricina.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006