spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 17, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3281-3287 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02383
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higham, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wainwright, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higham, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wainwright, P. C.

The pressures of suction feeding: the relation between buccal pressure and induced fluid speed in centrarchid fishes

Timothy E. Higham1,*, Steven W. Day2 and Peter C. Wainwright1

1 Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, 76 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5604, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Representative sequences of gape (black circles), fluid speed (green squares), and pressure (red triangles) for bluegill sunfish (A) and largemouth bass (B). Note that the magnitudes of subambient pressure and fluid speed are both greater in bluegill sunfish than largemouth bass.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A log-log plot of time to peak gape (TTPG, ms) versus peak buccal pressure (kPa) for largemouth bass (black circles) and bluegill sunfish (red triangles). For this plot, the absolute value of pressure was used. Note that as the duration of time to peak gape gets longer, the magnitude of pressure decreases. The relationship between these variables is much stronger for bluegill (r2=0.95) than for bass (r2=0.29).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The relative timing of peak pressure and peak fluid speed with respect to 20% of peak gape (dotted vertical line on the left) and 95% of peak gape (dotted vertical line on the right) for largemouth bass (black squares) and bluegill sunfish (red circles). Each value is scaled to the duration of time to peak gape where 0 is 20% and 1 is 95% of peak gape. Note that peak fluid speed follows peak gape in both largemouth bass and bluegill sunfish. The timing of peak pressure is earlier, relative to 95% of peak gape, in bass (0.51) than in bluegill (0.76).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Measured values of peak fluid speed (cm s-1) and peak buccal pressure (kPa) for largemouth bass (black upward triangles) and bluegill sunfish (red squares), and the fluid speeds predicted from the model (Muller et al., 1982Go) for largemouth bass (black downward triangles) and bluegill sunfish (red circles). As in previous plots, the absolute value of buccal pressure is shown. The lines designated as `model' are based on values of peak fluid speed calculated using the model (Muller et al., 1982Go) for the pressures that we measured. This was done separately for each species. See text for additional explanations. The slopes of the linear regressions fit to the model output (0.51) are higher than the slopes of the empirical data for largemouth bass (0.36) and bluegill sunfish (0.38), and the values for fluid speed predicted by the model are well above the measured values. Note that pressure explains more of the variation in fluid speed for bluegill (r2=0.79; P<0.001) than bass (r2=0.56; P<0.001). (A) Fluid speeds where we measured them are shown, at a distance equal to 1/2 peak gape away from the mouth aperture; (B) fluid speeds at the mouth aperture. In order to transform the measured values of fluid speed to values at the mouth aperture, we multiplied the bass values by 4.6 (Higham et al., 2006Go) and the bluegill values by 3.6 (Day et al., 2005Go), based on empirical relationships of the drop in fluid speed with distance from the mouth aperture. Note that the two species exhibit different relationships between pressure and fluid speed for fluid speeds measured at the mouth aperture, whereas the two species are similar for fluid speeds measured at 1/2 peak gape away from the mouth.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006