spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 3, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3101-3113 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02357
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Krumschnabel, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Krumschnabel, G.

Signalling pathways involved in hypertonicity- and acidification-induced activation of Na+/H+ exchange in trout hepatocytes

Khaled H. Ahmed, Bernd Pelster and Gerhard Krumschnabel*

Institut für Zoologie and Center of Molecular Biosciences, Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Changes in pHi (A) and in proton secretion rate (B) of trout hepatocytes upon exposing cells to hypertonicity (1.6x isosmolarity) in the presence and absence of 10 µmol l-1 cariporide. Values are means ± s.e.m. of 34-42 cells from three or four independent preparations in A and from 4-7 independent preparations in B.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of incubation at different pHe (6.8, 7.6 and 8.2) on the hypertonicity-induced changes in pHi. Values are means ± s.e.m. of 17-42 cells from three independent preparations.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Changes in [Ca2+]i upon hypertonic challenge using (a) Ca2+-containing medium (control), (b) Ca2+-free medium and (c) Ca2+-free medium along with preincubation of cells with the intracellular Ca2+-chelating agent BAPTA-AM. Values are means ± s.e.m. of 21-34 cells from 3-5 independent preparations.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Changes in pHi upon challenging cells with hypertonicity while using (a) Ca2+-containing medium (control), (b) Ca2+-free medium and (c) Ca2+-free medium along with preincubation of cells with the intracellular Ca2+-chelating agent BAPTA-AM. Values are means ± s.e.m. of 68-95 cells from 5-10 independent preparations. Inset: pHi changes upon exposing cells to 25 µmol l-1 BAPTA-AM followed by Ca2+-free medium. Values are means ± s.e.m. of 46 cells from three independent preparations.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of 1 and 5 µmol l-1 chelerythrine on basal pHi and on hypertonicity (hyper)-induced pHi changes (A) and the effect of 5 µmol l-1 chelerythrine on basal and hypertonic proton secretion rate (B). Values are means ± s.e.m. of 23-51 cells from three or four independent preparations in A and from four or five independent preparations in B.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of 1 µmol l-1 H-89 on basal pHi and on hypertonicity (hyper)-induced pHi changes (A) and on basal and hypertonic proton secretion rate (B). Values are means ± s.e.m. of 27-39 cells from three or four independent preparations in A and from three independent preparations in B.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effect of 5 µmol l-1 calmidazolium on basal pHi and on hypertonicity (hyper)-induced pHi changes (A) and on basal and hypertonic proton secretion rate (B). Values are means ± s.e.m. of 37-51 cells from three independent preparations in A and from four independent preparations in B.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Rates of proton secretion (calculated from the slope of the linear portion of the increase of pHi multiplied by ß) following hypertonic exposure. Values are expressed as percentages of the mean of the corresponding controls of each treatment.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. pHi recovery following 30 mmol l-1 sodium-propionate-induced acidification in the absence and presence of 10 µmol l-1 cariporide (A) and in the presence of 0.5 mmol l-1 SITS or SITS + cariporide (B). Values are means ± s.e.m. of 40-79 cells from 3-5 independent preparations in A and of 44-69 cells from three independent preparations in B.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Effects of 5 µmol l-1 chelerythrine (A), 1 µmol l-1 H-89 (B) and 5 µmol l-1 calmidazolium (C) on basal pHi and on pHi recovery after sodium-propionate-induced acidification. Values are means ± s.e.m. of ≥40 cells from ≥4 independent preparations.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Rates of proton secretion (calculated from the slope of the linear portion of the increase of pHi multiplied by ß) following acid loading. Values are expressed as percentages of the mean of the corresponding controls for each treatment.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006