spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 20, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2971-2978 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02341
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anttila, K.
Right arrow Articles by Järvilehto, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anttila, K.
Right arrow Articles by Järvilehto, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of different training protocols on Ca2+ handling and oxidative capacity in skeletal muscle of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

Katja Anttila, Satu Mänttäri* and Matti Järvilehto

Department of Biology, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FIN-90014, Oulu, Finland


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The alteration of the staining intensities of dihydropyridine (DHP; A,B) and ryanodine (Ry; C) receptors in white (A) and red (B,C) muscle sections of salmon. Sections were incubated in 20 nmol l-1 high affinity (-)-enantiomer of dihydropyridine labelled with orange fluorophore and in 0.5 µmol l-1 high affinity (-)-enantiomer of ryanodine labelled with green fluorophore. Exercise protocol: three different swimming velocities, 1, 1.5 and 2 BL s-1, and three different training periods, 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Difference between control and trained group significant at *P<0.05, {dagger}P<0.01 or {ddagger}P<0.001. CL, control level.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) The change in the optical density unit (oDu) values of dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) measured from white muscle homogenates analysed by western blotting. (B) The change in the optical density unit values of ryanodine receptor (RyR) from white muscle homogenates of salmon. (C) Membranes containing electrophoretically separated DHPR and RyR from white muscle of control and trained salmon. Exercise protocol: three different swimming velocities, 1 (low), 1.5 (intermediate) and 2 BL s-1 (high) and three different training durations, 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Difference between control (ctrl) and trained group significant at *P<0.05, {dagger}P<0.01 or {ddagger}P<0.001. CL, control level.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The alteration of staining intensities of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH; A,B) and phosphorylase (C,D) in red (B,D) and white (A,C) muscles of salmon measured from muscle sections obtained from fish exercised with different training protocols. Exercise protocol: three different swimming velocities, 1, 1.5 and 2 BL s-1, and three different training durations, 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Difference between control and trained group significant at *P<0.05, {dagger}P<0.01 or {ddagger}P<0.001. CL, control level.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006