spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 29, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2696-2703 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02288
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodela, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodela, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, P. A.

Characterization of diurnal urea excretion in the mangrove killifish, Rivulus marmoratus

Tammy M. Rodela and Patricia A. Wright*

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diurnal urea excretion (Jurea) (A) and ammonia excretion (Jamm) (B) in food-deprived Rivulus marmoratus exposed to a 12 h:12 h light:dark photoperiod (Series I). White and black bars above the graph indicate periods of light and dark, respectively. Values are expressed as means ± s.e.m. (N=8). Jurea values followed a significant rhythm (F2,9=23.8, P=0.0003) whereas Jamm did not demonstrate a rhythm (F2,9=0.84, P=0.46).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Diurnal urea excretion (Jurea) (A) and ammonia excretion (Jamm) (B) in fed Rivulus marmoratus exposed to a 12 h:12 h light:dark photoperiod (Series II). White and black bars above the graph indicate periods of light and dark, respectively. Arrows mark the times when the fish were fed. Values are expressed as means ± s.e.m. (N=8). Jurea values followed a significant rhythm (F2,9=18.3, P=0.0007). Jamm also demonstrated a significant rhythm (F2,9=11.6, P=0.0032).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Diurnal urea excretion (Jurea) in food-deprived Rivulus marmoratus exposed to a photoperiod of 0 h:24 h light:dark (Series III). The black bar above the graph indicates the dark period. Values are expressed as means ± s.e.m. (N=8). Jurea values followed a significant rhythm (F2,9=60.7, P=0.00001).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Diurnal urea excretion (Jurea) in food-deprived Rivulus marmoratus exposed to an inverse photoperiod of 12 h:12 h dark:light (Series IV). White and black bars above the graph indicate periods of light and dark, respectively. Values are expressed as means ± s.e.m. (N=8). Jurea values followed a significant rhythm (F2,9=39.6, P=0.00003).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Urea excretion (Jurea) (A) and ammonia excretion (Jamm) (B) in food-deprived Danio rerio exposed to a 12 h:12 h light:dark period (Series V). White and black bars above the graph indicate periods of light and dark, respectively. Values are expressed as means ± s.e.m. (N=8). Neither Jurea nor Jamm demonstrated a significant rhythm (F2,9=2.33, P=0.15, F2,9=1.28, P=0.33).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006