spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2138-2142 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02238
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crooks, E.
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crooks, E.
Right arrow Articles by Randolph, S. E.

Walking by Ixodes ricinus ticks: intrinsic and extrinsic factors determine the attraction of moisture or host odour

Emily Crooks and Sarah E. Randolph*

Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The percentage of high- and low-fat ticks that walked out of the introduction tube after 1 (white bars), 2 (light grey bars) and 24 h (dark grey bars). Each column shows the mean (±1 s.d.) over the four replicates under each of four experimental conditions: (A) the wet-dry gradient with no odour; (B) the wet-dry gradient with odour at the dry end; (C) uniform dry conditions with odour at one end; and (D) uniform wet conditions with odour at one end. The horizontal lines across each column show the proportion of ticks in the connecting tunnel (lower half) and the end boxes (upper half).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The percentage of high-fat (dark stipple) and low-fat (light stipple) ticks, of those that walked out of the introduction tube after 24 h, counted over all four replicates within one half of the arena (box plus connecting tunnel). (A) Ticks in the wet half of the arena (no odour). (B-D) Ticks in the odour half of the arena, where B has a wet-dry gradient with odour at the dry end, C has uniform dry conditions with odour at one end, and D has uniform wet conditions with odour at one end. {chi}2 values show comparisons between moisture conditions. The broken horizontal lines indicate an equal distribution of ticks between each half of the arenas.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006